3D Microseismic Monitoring Using Machine Learning

被引:33
作者
Chen, Yangkang [1 ]
Saad, Omar M. [2 ]
Savvaidis, Alexandros [1 ]
Chen, Yunfeng [3 ]
Fomel, Sergey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Bur Econ Geol, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Natl Res Inst Astron & Geophys NRIAG, Seismol Dept, Helwan, Egypt
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Key Lab Geosci Big Data & Deep Resource Zhejiang, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
EVENT DETECTION; SICHUAN BASIN; CO2; INJECTION; ALGORITHM; INVERSION; MIGRATION; FAULT; TIME;
D O I
10.1029/2021JB023842
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Microseismic source localization is important for inferring the dynamic status of the subsurface stress field during hydraulic fracturing. Traditional deterministic methods for 3D microseismic source localization require either ray tracing or full waveform modeling, thus are computationally expensive. We propose a very efficient (e.g., within 1 s) microseismic source localization method based on machine learning. First, three-dimensional (3D) ray tracing is performed with hypothetical event locations and realistic acquisition geometry to calculate the theoretical travel-times. The theoretical travel-time differences and the spatial locations of the stations are treated as the input features of the training data set, and the corresponding source locations are used as the labels. The manually or automatically picked arrival time differences between different stations and a reference station after a microseismic event and the actual station locations are fed into the well-trained model for a fast and accurate location prediction. The proposed method is efficient enough to be widely applied for the real-time monitoring of hydraulic fracturing. The machine learning model is analogous to 3D grid search but performs 3D ray tracings before the actual localization, and needs to be retrained when applied to a new study area. We use several synthetic tests and a real data example from the Weiyuan hydraulic fracturing experiment in Sichuan, China, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The application of the proposed method to earthquake localization is also demonstrated to be straightforward. Plain Language Summary Microseismic source localization helps to monitor the dynamic status of the target subsurface area during hydraulic fracturing. In traditional methods, the source location is estimated by either travel-time-based or waveform-based methods in an inversion framework. Most state-of-the-art localization methods are based on a 1D velocity model to be computationally efficient, which sacrifices the location accuracy. When it comes to 3D localization that is more accurate, it requires the 3D ray tracing for travel-time-based methods or solving the full wave equation for waveform-based methods, which are both computationally expensive. Here, we present a very fast and accurate 3D source localization method based on machine learning. The proposed method is conceptually simple and easy to implement, and can hopefully substitute the state-of-the-art methods for real-time seismic monitoring purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2016-13262278
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IEEE Trans. Broadcast.
[3]   Overview of microseismic response to CO2 injection into the Mt. Simon saline reservoir at the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project [J].
Bauer, Robert A. ;
Carney, Michael ;
Finley, Robert J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 54 :378-388
[4]   Clustering-based stress inversion from focal mechanisms in microseismic monitoring of hydrofracturing [J].
Chen, Xiaoqing ;
Wang, Runqiu ;
Huang, Weilin ;
Jiang, Yongyong ;
Yin, Chen .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 215 (03) :1887-1899
[5]  
Chen Y., 2022, WEIYUAN FIGSHARE, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.19170245.v3, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.19170245.V3]
[6]  
Chen Y., 2021, SEISMOL RES LETT, V92, DOI [10.1785/02202100, DOI 10.1785/02202100]
[7]   Fast waveform detection for microseismic imaging using unsupervised machine learning [J].
Chen, Yangkang .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 215 (02) :1185-1199
[8]   A zoning model for coal mining - induced strata movement based on microseismic monitoring [J].
Cheng, Guanwen ;
Ma, Tianhui ;
Tang, Chunan ;
Liu, Hongyuan ;
Wang, Sujian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2017, 94 :123-138
[9]   Discrimination of Mine Seismic Events and Blasts Using the Fisher Classifier, Naive Bayesian Classifier and Logistic Regression [J].
Dong, Longjun ;
Wesseloo, Johan ;
Potvin, Yves ;
Li, Xibing .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (01) :183-211
[10]   Microseismic imaging of a geothermal reservoir stimulation [J].
Semore Seismic, Cornwall, United Kingdom ;
不详 ;
不详 .
Leading Edge, 2008, 7 (856-869) :856-869