Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days' gestation

被引:42
作者
Lokeland, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Iversen, Ole Erik [1 ,2 ]
Engeland, Anders [3 ,4 ]
Okland, Ingrid [1 ]
Bjorge, Line [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, N-5053 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Home; termination of pregnancy; mifepristone; misoprostol; acceptability; travel distance; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; ACCEPTABILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.12398
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of medical abortion at home up to 63 days' gestation without limits on travel distance to a registered institution. Design. Observational prospective study. Setting. Haukeland University Hospital between May 2006 and May 2009. Population. A total of 1018 women requesting abortion before 63 days' gestation who chose medical termination with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol. Methods. The women took 200 mg mifepristone under nurse supervision and self-administered 800 mu g misoprostol vaginally 36-48 h later at home. All were contacted by phone for follow-up and assessment of bleeding, pain and acceptability. Main outcome measures. Evacuation rate, pain, bleeding, acceptability, influence of distance on treatment. Results. Median gestational age was 50 (range 3563) days and 70 (7.1%) of the women lived more than 60 min travel from the clinic. The rate of completed abortion was 93.6% and surgical evacuation was performed in 50 (4.9%) cases. Two women requested treatment on the day of misoprostol use. Moderate to strong pain was experienced by 68.4%, and 74.7% reported moderate to heavy bleeding. Parous women experienced less pain than nulliparous women (odds ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.34). In all, 95.1% of the women were satisfied with staying at home. Travel distance did not influence treatment outcome variables. Conclusions. In our experience, home administration of misoprostol is an effective and acceptable method for abortion up to 63 days of gestation and women should be eligible for this treatment option regardless of their travel distance from hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 653
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway
    Bjorge, L
    Johnsen, SL
    Midboe, G
    Augestad, G
    Okland, I
    Helland, H
    Stray-Pedersen, S
    Iversen, OE
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 80 (11) : 1056 - 1061
  • [2] BJORGE L, 2009, PROVOSERT ABORT NORS
  • [3] Alternatives to a Routine Follow-Up Visit for Early Medical Abortion
    Clark, Wesley
    Bracken, Hillary
    Tanenhaus, Jini
    Schweikert, Suzanne
    Lichtenberg, E. Steve
    Winikoff, Beverly
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (02) : 264 - 272
  • [4] Dagousset I, 2004, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V32, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.11.005
  • [5] Ruling prevents women taking second abortion pill at home
    Dyer, Clare
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [6] Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing
    Fiala, C
    Safar, P
    Bygdeman, M
    Gemzell-Danielsson, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 109 (02): : 190 - 195
  • [7] Gasemyr K, 2013, 50070197 NORW I PUBL
  • [8] Gomperts R, 2008, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V115, P1578, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01923.x
  • [9] Regional differences in surgical intervention following medical termination of pregnancy provided by telemedicine
    Gomperts, Rebecca
    Petow, Sabine A. M.
    Jelinska, Kinga
    Steen, Louis
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Kleiverda, Gunilla
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [10] Home self-administration of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 56 days' gestation
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2005, 31 (03) : 189 - 192