Comparative evaluation of non-structural protein-antibody detecting ELISAs for foot-and-mouth disease sero-surveillance under intensive vaccination

被引:24
作者
Sharma, Gaurav Kumar [1 ]
Mohapatra, Jajati Keshari [1 ]
Mahajan, Sonalika [1 ]
Matura, Rakesh [1 ]
Subramaniam, Saravanan [1 ]
Pattnaik, Bramhadev [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Council Agr Res, Project Directorate Foot & Mouth Dis, Mukteshwar 263138, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
FMD virus; DIVA; NSP ELISA; Assay validation; DIFFERENTIATING INFECTION; SERODIAGNOSTIC STRATEGY; RECOMBINANT; VIRUS; POLYPROTEIN; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; CATTLE; TESTS; 3ABC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.06.022
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly infectious and contagious disease of livestock animals with transboundary and economical importance. Animals in the endemic settings are regularly vaccinated in addition to intensive surveillance for control of the disease. Under intensive vaccination, detection of infected animals among the vaccinated population is essential to monitor the infection and to track down the virus movement. Sero-surveillance and retrospective disease diagnosis is performed primarily by detecting antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSPs) of FMD virus which are usually absent in the inactivated vaccine formulations. The study was conducted with an objective to compare simultaneously performance of six NSP ELISAs in detecting infected animals in the areas covered under intensive vaccination, and to assess their fit-for-purpose attribute for sero-surveillance of FMD in India. A panel of bovine serum samples consisting of samples collected from infected with FMDV, vaccinated and naive animals were constituted. In addition, samples collected at random from areas having varied FMD situation and vaccination coverage were tested simultaneously by the six NSP ELISAs to compare their performances. The four indigenous assays showed varying degrees of correlation with the two commercial kits. The study validated that, in all the groups of samples, the indigenous assays were equally sensitive and specific as the two commercial kits. Among all the six assays, PrioCheck and in-house 3ABC I-ELISAs showed maximum sensitivity for detection of infected animals, whereas 3AB3 I-ELISA and 3ABC C-ELISA showed maximum specificity. The study concluded that the in-house available assays are equally capable as the commercially available kits for differentiation of infected animals under intensive vaccination and identifies the 3AB3 I-ELISA with optimum sensitivity and specificity for the purpose of sero-surveillance in India. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Improvement of a serodiagnostic strategy for foot-and-mouth disease virus surveillance in cattle under systematic vaccination:: a combined system of an indirect ELISA-3ABC with an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay [J].
Bergmann, IE ;
Malirat, V ;
Neitzert, E ;
Beck, E ;
Panizzutti, N ;
Sánchez, C ;
Falczuk, A .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2000, 145 (03) :473-489
[2]   Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Brocchi, E. ;
Bergmann, I. E. ;
Dekker, A. ;
Paton, D. J. ;
Sammin, D. J. ;
Greiner, M. ;
Grazioli, S. ;
De Simone, F. ;
Yadin, H. ;
Haas, B. ;
Bulut, N. ;
Malirat, V. ;
Neitzert, E. ;
Goris, N. ;
Parida, S. ;
Sorensen, K. ;
De Clercq, K. .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 (47-48) :6966-6979
[3]   Differentiating infection from vaccination in foot-and-mouth-disease: evaluation of an ELISA based on recombinant 3ABC [J].
Bruderer, U ;
Swam, H ;
Haas, B ;
Visser, N ;
Brocchi, E ;
Grazioli, S ;
Esterhuysen, JJ ;
Vosloo, W ;
Forsyth, M ;
Aggarwal, N ;
Cox, S ;
Armstrong, R ;
Anderson, J .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (03) :187-197
[4]   Comparison of sensitivity and specificity in three commercial foot-and-mouth disease virus non-structural protein ELISA kits with swine sera in Taiwan [J].
Chen, S. P. ;
Ellis, T. M. ;
Lee, M. C. ;
Cheng, I. C. ;
Yang, P. C. ;
Lin, Y. L. ;
Jong, M. H. ;
Robertson, I. D. ;
Edwards, J. R. .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 119 (2-4) :164-172
[5]   Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review [J].
Cox, Sarah J. ;
Barnett, Paul V. .
VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2009, 40 (03)
[6]   The non-structural polyprotein 3ABC of foot-and-mouth disease virus as a diagnostic antigen in ELISA to differentiate infected from vaccinated cattle [J].
DeDiego, M ;
Brocchi, E ;
Mackay, D ;
DeSimone, F .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 1997, 142 (10) :2021-2033
[7]   Use of continuous results to compare ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Dekker, Aldo ;
Sammin, Donal ;
Greiner, Matthias ;
Bergmann, Ingrid ;
Paton, David ;
Grazioli, Santina ;
de Clercq, Kris ;
Brocchi, Emiliana .
VACCINE, 2008, 26 (22) :2723-2732
[8]   A Bayesian evaluation of six diagnostic tests for foot-and-mouth disease for vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle [J].
Engel, Bas ;
Buist, Willem ;
Orsel, Karin ;
Dekker, Aldo ;
de Clercq, Kris ;
Grazioli, Santina ;
van Roermund, Herman .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2008, 86 (1-2) :124-138
[9]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[10]   Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious diseases [J].
Jacobson, RH .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1998, 17 (02) :469-486