Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions

被引:417
作者
De Silva, Mary J. [1 ]
Breuer, Erica [2 ]
Lee, Lucy [1 ]
Asher, Laura [1 ]
Chowdhary, Neerja [3 ]
Lund, Crick [2 ]
Patel, Vikram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Ctr Global Mental Hlth, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Univ Cape Town, Alan J Flisher Ctr Publ Mental Hlth, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Sangath, Bardez 403521, Goa, India
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Complex interventions; Theory of Change; MRC framework for complex interventions; COMMUNITY-HEALTH WORKERS; EVALUATING COMPLEX; DESIGN; LESSONS; PROGRAM; CARE; BEHAVIOR; DEVELOP; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-15-267
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The Medical Research Councils' framework for complex interventions has been criticized for not including theory-driven approaches to evaluation. Although the framework does include broad guidance on the use of theory, it contains little practical guidance for implementers and there have been calls to develop a more comprehensive approach. A prospective, theory-driven process of intervention design and evaluation is required to develop complex healthcare interventions which are more likely to be effective, sustainable and scalable. Methods: We propose a theory-driven approach to the design and evaluation of complex interventions by adapting and integrating a programmatic design and evaluation tool, Theory of Change (ToC), into the MRC framework for complex interventions. We provide a guide to what ToC is, how to construct one, and how to integrate its use into research projects seeking to design, implement and evaluate complex interventions using the MRC framework. We test this approach by using ToC within two randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized evaluation of complex interventions. Results: Our application of ToC in three research projects has shown that ToC can strengthen key stages of the MRC framework. It can aid the development of interventions by providing a framework for enhanced stakeholder engagement and by explicitly designing an intervention that is embedded in the local context. For the feasibility and piloting stage, ToC enables the systematic identification of knowledge gaps to generate research questions that strengthen intervention design. ToC may improve the evaluation of interventions by providing a comprehensive set of indicators to evaluate all stages of the causal pathway through which an intervention achieves impact, combining evaluations of intervention effectiveness with detailed process evaluations into one theoretical framework. Conclusions: Incorporating a ToC approach into the MRC framework holds promise for improving the design and evaluation of complex interventions, thereby increasing the likelihood that the intervention will be ultimately effective, sustainable and scalable. We urge researchers developing and evaluating complex interventions to consider using this approach, to evaluate its usefulness and to build an evidence base to further refine the methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Developing a logic model for youth mental health: participatory research with a refugee community in Beirut
    Afifi, Rema A.
    Makhoul, Jihad
    El Hajj, Taghreed
    Nakkash, Rima T.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2011, 26 (06) : 508 - 517
  • [2] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [3] Anderson A., 2005, The community builder's approach to theory of change: A practical guide to theory development
  • [4] Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews
    Anderson, Laurie M.
    Petticrew, Mark
    Rehfuess, Eva
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Ueffing, Erin
    Baker, Phillip
    Francis, Daniel
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2011, 2 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [5] New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions
    Anderson, Rob
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676):
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, Simulation: the practice of model development and use
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, FACILITATORS SOURCE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1998, NEW APPROACHES EVALU
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1995, NEW APPROACHES EVALU
  • [10] Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models
    Bagozzi, Richard P.
    Yi, Youjae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) : 8 - 34