A Systematic Evidence Review of the Check-In/Check-Out Program for Reducing Student Challenging Behaviors

被引:76
作者
Maggin, Daniel M. [1 ]
Zurheide, Jamie [1 ]
Pickett, Kayci C. [1 ]
Baillie, Sara J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
check-in/check-out; evidence-based practice; positive behavioral interventions and supports; secondary interventions; systematic review; SCHOOL STUDENTS; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; SUPPORTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/1098300715573630
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Three-tiered models of prevention are increasingly being adopted by schools to address the behavioral needs of students. A critical component of multitiered systems are secondary interventions used with students in need of behavioral support but who are not candidates for individualized interventions. Despite the importance of secondary interventions, questions remain regarding which approaches have sufficient empirical support to warrant their use. The purpose of this review was, therefore, to examine the research underlying the Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) program, a widely used secondary intervention, to determine the strengths, limitations, and generality of the accumulated research. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) procedures for evaluating single-case and group-based research were applied with results indicating mixed support for the program. Specifically, there were a sufficient number of single-case research studies to deem the CICO program as evidence-based, while the group-based research had no demonstrated effects. These findings are discussed in terms of future research on the CICO program and the broader implications for selecting and implementing secondary interventions in school settings.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]  
Busk P.L., 1992, SINGLE CASE RES DESI
[4]   CHECK-IN/CHECK-OUT: A SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION AND COMPONENT ANALYSIS [J].
Campbell, Amy ;
Anderson, Cynthia M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2011, 44 (02) :315-326
[5]  
Campbell A, 2008, BEHAV DISORDERS, V33, P233
[6]   A 2-Year Outcome Study of the Check, Connect, and Expect Intervention for Students At Risk for Severe Behavior Problems [J].
Cheney, Douglas A. ;
Stage, Scott A. ;
Hawken, Leanne S. ;
Lynass, Lori ;
Mielenz, Christine ;
Waugh, Maryann .
JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2009, 17 (04) :226-243
[7]  
Crone D.A., 2010, Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program
[8]   Primary and secondary prevention of behavior difficulties: Developing a data-informed problem-solving model to guide decision making at a school-wide level [J].
Ervin, Ruth A. ;
Schaughency, Elizabeth ;
Matthews, Amy ;
Goodman, Steven D. ;
McGlinchey, Margaret T. .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2007, 44 (01) :7-18
[9]   Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade [J].
Fairbanks, Sarah ;
Sugai, George ;
Guardino, David ;
Lathrop, Margaret .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2007, 73 (03) :288-310
[10]  
Filter K.J., 2007, Education and Treatment of Children, V30, P69, DOI DOI 10.1353/ETC.2007.0000