Heuristic method for robust optimization model for green closed-loop supply chain network design of perishable goods

被引:107
作者
Yavari, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Geraeli, Mohaddese [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Fac Technol & Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Qom, Ctr Environm Res, Qom, Iran
关键词
Green closed-loop supply chain; Heuristic algorithm; Robust optimization; Perishable goods; REVERSE LOGISTICS NETWORK; FACILITY LOCATION; PROGRAMMING MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; INVENTORY; MANAGEMENT; DEMAND; DECISIONS; IMPACT; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.279
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the current study, a green closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable products is investigated under uncertain conditions. The demands, rate of return and the quality of returned products stand as an uncertain parameter. The considered chain, based on the study of a dairy company, is a multi-period and multi-product that comprises suppliers, manufacturers, warehouses, retailers and collection centers. A mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is projected to minimize the cost and environmental pollutant, simultaneously. Besides, an innovative MILP robust model is developed for the problem under uncertainty. Due to the NP-hard nature of the problem, the research has developed an efficient heuristic, named YAG, to solve large-sized problems. Computational experiments conducted indicating that the YAG method has an average gap of less than 1.65 percent from the optimal solution within a reasonable time. Also, the YAG method finds the optimal solution in more than 34 percent of instances. The performance of the robust approach and the heuristic method is examined in a real case study and a diverse range of problems. The results revealed that the robust model compared to the deterministic model has better quality and seem quite more reliable. The effect of the product's lifetime, bi-objective modeling and environmental pollutant are considered throughout the study. The results indicate that the effects of products' lifetime and level of uncertainty vary for cost and environmental pollution objectives. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 305
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Incorporating location, inventory and price decisions into a supply chain distribution network design problem [J].
Ahmadi-Javid, Amir ;
Hoseinpour, Pooya .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 56 :110-119
[2]   A location-inventory-pricing model in a closed loop supply chain network with correlated demands and shortages under a periodic review system [J].
Ahmadzadeh, Elham ;
Vahdani, Behnam .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 101 :148-166
[3]   A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return [J].
Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh ;
Zhang, Guoqing .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (06) :4165-4176
[4]  
BenTal A, 2009, PRINC SER APPL MATH, P1
[5]   The price of robustness [J].
Bertsimas, D ;
Sim, M .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 52 (01) :35-53
[6]   Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: A comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques [J].
Devika, K. ;
Jafarian, A. ;
Nourbakhsh, V. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 235 (03) :594-615
[7]   A closed-loop location-inventory problem with spare parts consideration [J].
Diabat, Ali ;
Abdallah, Tarek ;
Henschel, Andreas .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 54 :245-256
[8]   A closed-loop supply chain network design problem with integrated forward and reverse channel decisions [J].
Easwaran, Gopalakrishnan ;
Uster, Halit .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2010, 42 (11) :779-792
[9]   A stochastic model for forward-reverse logistics network design under risk [J].
El-Sayed, M. ;
Afia, N. ;
El-Kharbotly, A. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 58 (03) :423-431
[10]   A robust fuzzy stochastic programming model for the design of a reliable green closed-loop supply chain network [J].
Fazli-Khalaf, Mohamadreza ;
Mirzazadeh, Abolfazl ;
Pishvaee, Mir Saman .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2017, 23 (08) :2119-2149