Explosion pressure measurement of methane-air mixtures in different sizes of confinement

被引:57
|
作者
Mittal, Manju [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIR, Cent Bldg Res Inst, Fire Res Lab, Roorkee 247667, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Methane; Explosion; Deflagration index; Confinement size; Different shapes; BURNING VELOCITY DETERMINATION; SPHERICAL BOMB TECHNIQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.022
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This article reports the results of an experimental study on explosion pressure measurement in closed vessel deflagration for methane-air mixtures over its entire flammable range at standard pressure and temperature in vessels with variable geometry and size- 20-L spherical, 27-L cubical, 0.8 m(3) rectangular and 25.6 m(3) spherical-under quiescent conditions using electric spark (3 J) as ignition source. The outcome of the study is comprehensive data that quantify the dependency of explosion severity parameters on gas concentration and vessel volume. The information is required to quantify the potential severity of an explosion, design the vessels able to withstand an explosion and to design explosion safety measures for installations handling this gas. The data presented include maximum explosion pressure, explosion time and rate of explosion pressure rise in terms of deflagration index over a range of methane-air equivalence ratio (phi: 0.53-1.52). The maximum explosion pressures are: 8.6, 8.4, 8.2 and 8.0 bar in 20-L sphere, 27-L cubical vessel, 0.8 m(3) rectangular vessel and 25.6 m(3) sphere, respectively, at phi=1.05. Time to reach the maximum explosion pressure varies from 80 ms in 20-L sphere to 680 ms in 25.6 m(3) sphere. The deflagration index values are: 82, 84, 86 and 106 bar m/s in 20-L sphere, 27-L cubical vessel, 0.8 m(3) rectangular vessel and 25.6 m(3) sphere, respectively, at phi=1.05. The deflagration index increases with increase in size of the test vessel. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 208
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spontaneous ignition of methane-air mixtures in a wide range of pressures
    Zhukov, VP
    Sechenov, VA
    Starikovskii, AY
    COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 2003, 39 (05) : 487 - 495
  • [22] Fast-flame limit for hydrogen/methane-air mixtures
    Ciccarelli, G.
    Chaumeix, N.
    Mendiburu, A. Z.
    N'Guessan, K.
    Comandini, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2019, 37 (03) : 3661 - 3668
  • [23] Effects of hydrogen addition on oblique detonations in methane-air mixtures
    Xi, Xuechen
    Tian, Cheng
    Wang, Kuanliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (13) : 8621 - 8629
  • [24] Hybrid detonations in oats dust clouds in methane-air mixtures
    Wolinski, M
    Teodorczyk, A
    Wolanski, P
    Klemens, R
    Sichel, M
    Nettleton, MA
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 120 (1-6) : 39 - 53
  • [25] Ignition Characteristics for Methane-Air Mixtures atVarious Initial Temperatures
    Zhang, Qi
    Li, Wei
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2013, 32 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [26] Ignition of methane-air mixtures by laser heated small particles
    Dubaniewicz, TH
    Cashdollar, KL
    Green, GM
    Chaiken, RF
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2000, 13 (3-5) : 349 - 359
  • [27] Modification of commercial BC dry chemical powder suppressant and experiments on suppression of methane-air explosion
    Wang, Xinqun
    Wang, Ting
    Xu, Haishun
    Yang, Jian
    Wolanski, P.
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2015, 66 (12): : 5171 - 5178
  • [28] Explosion behavior of hydrogen-methane/air mixtures
    Salzano, Ernesto
    Cammarota, Francesco
    Di Benedetto, Almerinda
    Di Sarli, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2012, 25 (03) : 443 - 447
  • [29] Explosion characteristics of methane-ethane mixtures in air
    Shen, Xiaobo
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhang, Xiaoliang
    Xiu, Guangli
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 45 : 102 - 107
  • [30] Application of large eddy simulation in methane-air explosion prediction using thickening flame approach
    Zheng, Kai
    Jiang, Juncheng
    Xing, Zhixiang
    Hao, YongMei
    Yu, Minggao
    Yang, Xufeng
    Tao, Yuwei
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 159 : 662 - 673