Sit-to-stand test in children with bronchiectasis: Does it measure functional exercise capacity?

被引:6
作者
Zeren, Melih [1 ]
Gurses, Hulya Nilgun [2 ]
Kulli, Hilal Denizoglu [2 ]
Ucgun, Hikmet [2 ]
Cakir, Erkan [3 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Silahtaraga St 189, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Chest Dis, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
HEART & LUNG | 2020年 / 49卷 / 06期
关键词
Bronchiectasis; Children; Functional exercise capacity; Physical performance; Sit-to-stand test; Six-minute walk test; Validity; FIELD WALKING TESTS; CYSTIC-FIBROSIS; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; TOLERANCE; STATEMENT; PEOPLE; COPD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Similar to six-minute walk test (6MWT), sit-to-stand test (STST) is a self-paced test which elicits sub-maximal effort; therefore, it is suggested as an alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in various pulmonary conditions including COPD and cystic fibrosis. We aimed to investigate the association between 30-second STST (30s-STST) and 6MWT in both children with bronchiectasis (BE) and their healthy counterparts, as well as exploring cardiorespiratory burden and discriminative properties of both tests. Methods: Sixty children (6 to 18-year-old) diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis BE and 20 age-matched healthy controls were included. Both groups performed 30s-STST and 6MWT. Test results, and heart rate, SpO(2) and dyspnea responses to tests were recorded. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that 30s-STST was able to explain 52% of variance in 6MWT (r = 0.718, p<0.001) in BE group, whereas 20% of variance in healthy controls (r = 0.453, p = 0.045). 6MWT elicited higher changes in heart rate and dyspnea level compared to 30s-STST, indicating it was more physically demanding. Both 30s-STST (21.65 +/- 5.28 vs 26.55 +/- 3.56 repetitions) and 6MWT (538 +/- 85 vs 596 +/- 54 m) were significantly lower in BE group compared to healthy controls (p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the ROC curve (UAC) of 0.765 for 30s-STST and 0.693 for 6MWT in identifying the individuals with or without BE (p<0.05). Comparison between AUCs of 30s-STST and 6MWT yielded no significant difference (p = 0.466), indicating both tests had similar discriminative properties. Conclusions: 30s-STST is found to be a valid alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in chil-dren with BE. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 802
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An instrumented sit-to-stand test used to examine differences between older fallers and non-fallers
    Doheny, Emer P.
    Fan, Chie Wei
    Foran, Timothy
    Greene, Barry R.
    Cunningham, Clodagh
    Kenny, Rose Anne
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 3063 - 3066
  • [42] The 1-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test in Lung Transplant Candidates: An Alternative to the 6-Minute Walk Test
    Kohlbrenner, Dario
    Benden, Christian
    Radtke, Thomas
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2020, 65 (04) : 437 - 443
  • [43] Validity and Reproducibility of an Incremental Sit-To-Stand Exercise Test for Evaluating Anaerobic Threshold in Young, Healthy Individuals
    Nakamura, Keisuke
    Ohira, Masayoshi
    Yokokawa, Yoshiharu
    Nagasawa, Yuya
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2015, 14 (04) : 708 - 715
  • [44] Ability of sit-to-stand with hands reflects neurological and functional impairments in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury
    Saensook, Wilairat
    Mato, Lugkana
    Manimmanakorn, Nattaset
    Amatachaya, Pipatana
    Sooknuan, Thanat
    Amatachaya, Sugalya
    SPINAL CORD, 2018, 56 (03) : 232 - 238
  • [45] Comparison of available equations to estimate sit-to-stand muscle power and their association with gait speed and frailty in older people: Practical applications for the 5-rep sit-to-stand test
    Baltasar-Fernandez, Ivan
    Alcazar, Julian
    Losa-Reyna, Jose
    Soto-Paniagua, Hector
    Alegre, Luis M.
    Takai, Yohei
    Ruiz-Cardenas, Juan D.
    Signorile, Joseph F.
    Rodriguez-Manas, Leocadio
    Garcia-Garcia, Francisco J.
    Ara, Ignacio
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2021, 156
  • [46] Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
    Trivedi, Puja
    Patel, Suhani
    Edwards, George
    Jenkins, Timothy
    Man, William D. C.
    Nolan, Claire M.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2024, 21 (04) : 577 - 584
  • [47] Comparison of Azure Kinect and optical retroreflective motion capture for kinematic and spatiotemporal evaluation of the sit-to-stand test
    Thomas, Jacob
    Hall, Jamie B.
    Bliss, Rebecca
    Guess, Trent M.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2022, 94 : 153 - 159
  • [48] Validity and reliability of an iPhone App to assess time, velocity and leg power during a sit-to-stand functional performance test
    Diego Ruiz-Cardenas, Juan
    Jose Rodriguez-Juan, Juan
    Smart, Rowan R.
    Jakobi, Jennifer M.
    Jones, Gareth R.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 59 : 261 - 266
  • [49] Sit-to-stand exercise programs improve sit-to-stand performance in people with physical impairments due to health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chaovalit, Sirawee
    Taylor, Nicholas F.
    Dodd, Karen J.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (09) : 1202 - 1211
  • [50] Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis
    Moller, Andreas Buch
    Bibby, Bo Martin
    Skjerbaek, Anders Guldhammer
    Jensen, Ellen
    Sorensen, Henrik
    Stenager, Egon
    Dalgas, Ulrik
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 34 (26) : 2251 - 2258