Economic evaluation of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

被引:0
作者
Doorduijn, JK
Buijt, I
van der Holt, B
van Agthoven, M
Sonneveld, P
Groot, CAU
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Hematol, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Inst Med Technol Assessment, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Inst Med Technol Assessment, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, HOVON Data Ctr, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; costs; CHOP; G-CSF; granulocyte colony; stimulating factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. Treatment with CHOP chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is less effective and accompanied by more adverse effects than in younger patients. The prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might improve the results, but increases the costs of treatment. We analyzed the costs of therapy and follow-up of patients with NHL treated with CHOP with or without G-CSF prophylaxis. Design and Methods. Four hundred and eleven patients were randomized for treatment with CHOP or CHOP+G-CSF. A detailed study of treatment costs from randomization until 3 years of follow-up or death was performed in a subset of 100 out of 389 eligible patients. Because costs during follow-up were independent of the use of G-CSF during treatment, costs of follow-up and second-line treatment were calculated irrespective of the treatment arm. Results. Total hospital costs for first-line treatment were 12178 euro [95% Cl 10297 euro 14059] euro for CHOP alone and 18356 euro [95% Cl 15807 euro - 20906 euro] for CHOP + G-CSF costs during follow-up showed a wide difference (range 74 euro - 53925 euro) depending on disease status and choice of treatment in the case of relapse or progression. Interpretation and Conclusions. The clinical study showed no difference between the treatment arms in response, overall survival or event-free survival, while the costs were significantly higher in the G-CSF arm. We conclude that the addition of prophylactic GCSF to CHOP chemotherapy is not cost-effective in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1117
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Adams Jared R, 2002, Expert Opin Pharmacother, V3, P1273
[2]   AGGRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR DIFFUSE HISTIOCYTIC LYMPHOMA IN THE ELDERLY - INCREASED COMPLICATIONS WITH ADVANCING AGE [J].
ARMITAGE, JO ;
POTTER, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1984, 32 (04) :269-273
[3]   Patients aged ≤ 70 are at high risk for neutropenic infection and should receive hemopoietic growth factors when treated with moderately toxic chemotherapy [J].
Balducci, L ;
Lyman, GH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (05) :1583-1584
[4]  
Balducci L, 2000, ONCOLOGY-NY, V14, P221
[5]  
Barber JA, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3219, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3219::AID-SIM623>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-P
[7]   Elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Disease presentation, response to treatment, and survival - A groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte study on 453 patients older than 69 years [J].
Bastion, YB ;
Blay, JY ;
Divine, M ;
Brice, P ;
Bordessoule, D ;
Sebban, C ;
Blanc, M ;
Tilly, T ;
Lederlin, P ;
Deconinck, E ;
Salles, B ;
Dumontet, C ;
Briere, J ;
Coiffier, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (08) :2945-2953
[8]  
BENNETT CL, 2000, CRIT REV ONCOL HEM S, V48, pS71
[9]  
Bobey N, 1998, CLIN INVEST MED, V21, P63
[10]  
Briggs A, 1998, HEALTH ECON, V7, P723, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199812)7:8<723::AID-HEC392>3.3.CO