Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes based on various natural gas chemical looping systems with carbon capture

被引:75
作者
Chisalita, Dora-Andreea [1 ]
Cormos, Calin-Cristian [1 ]
机构
[1] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Chem & Chem Engn, 11 Arany Janos St, RO-400028 Cluj Napoca, Romania
关键词
Hydrogen production; Carbon capture and storage; Chemical looping systems; Techno-economic evaluation; CO2; CAPTURE; POWER COGENERATION; H-2; PRODUCTION; COMBINED-CYCLE; COMBUSTION; DESIGN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.179
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hydrogen is regarded as a promising energy carrier with several key advantages for future low carbon applications (e.g. no greenhouse gas emission at the point of use, higher energy conversion efficiency). This paper is assessing from a techno-economic point of view, three chemical looping processes suitable for hydrogen production generating high purity hydrogen corresponding to 300 MW thermal output, with a carbon capture rate of at least 90%: i) chemical looping hydrogen production (CLH), ii) sorption enhanced reforming (SER), iii) sorption enhanced chemical-looping reforming (SECLR). Key technoeconomic performance indicators were evaluated and compared amongst each other and against a conventional natural gas reforming technology without/with carbon capture by chemical gas-liquid absorption using alkanolamines. The results show that CLH using iron-based (i.e. ilmenite) oxygen carder seems to be the most promising hydrogen production technology amongst the evaluated systems having the highest energy efficiency at CCR>99%, lower operating and maintenance (O&M) costs, with a hydrogen production cost of 41.84 (sic)/MWh compared to 42.43 (sic)/MWh for no capture conventional reforming and 44.58 (sic)/MWh for amine-based capture with 70% CCR, at a CO2 emissions avoidance cost of 19.46 (sic)/t(CO2). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 344
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHEM PROCESS DESIGN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NRELSR54032525
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, KEY WORLD EN STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]   Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming coupled with in situ CO2 capture [J].
Antzara, Andy ;
Heracleous, Eleni ;
Bukur, Dragomir B. ;
Lemonidou, Angeliki A. .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 :6576-6589
[6]  
Atsonios K, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 2
[7]   CO2 capture from the industry sector [J].
Bains, Praveen ;
Psarras, Peter ;
Wilcox, Jennifer .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2017, 63 :146-172
[8]   Production of Very Pure Hydrogen with Simultaneous Capture of Carbon Dioxide using the Redox Reactions of Iron Oxides in Packed Beds [J].
Bohn, Christopher D. ;
Mueller, Christoph R. ;
Cleeton, Jason P. ;
Hayhurst, Allan N. ;
Davidson, John F. ;
Scott, Stuart A. ;
Dennis, John S. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (20) :7623-7630
[9]   Three-reactors chemical looping process for hydrogen production [J].
Chiesa, Paolo ;
Lozza, Giovanni ;
Malandrino, Alberto ;
Romano, Matteo ;
Piccolo, Vincenzo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2008, 33 (09) :2233-2245
[10]   Dynamic simulation of fluidized bed chemical looping combustion process with iron based oxygen carrier [J].
Chisalita, Dora-Andreea ;
Cormos, Ana-Maria .
FUEL, 2018, 214 :436-445