Exploring Year 6 pupils' perceptions of private tutoring: evidence from three mainstream schools in England

被引:24
作者
Hajar, Anas [1 ]
机构
[1] Canterbury Christ Church Univ, Fac Educ, Canterbury, Kent, England
关键词
Private tutoring (PT); Year 6 pupils' perceptions; tangible and intangible benefits; qualitative inquiry; SHADOW EDUCATION; STUDENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/03054985.2018.1430563
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While quantitative research on the nature and extent of private tutoring in England is increasingly available, very limited evidence exists regarding pupils' voices in evaluating their participation in private tutoring. Thus, the present qualitative study seeks to investigate the perceptions of 14 Year 6 pupils from three primary schools in East Kent of receiving tutoring. Data were collected through semi-structured focus group interviews and pupils' drawings. The data suggest that the participants displayed prevention (ought) orientation by conceiving tutoring as a powerful means to help them to pass the grammar school entrance exam and thus avoid failing their parents' expectations. However, some participants gradually realised that the advantages of receiving tutoring were not restricted to tangible (quantifiable) benefits related to improved examination results. Tutoring also enabled them to achieve their desired possible self-image by boosting their self-esteem and interest in learning, and becoming more confident when socialising with others (i.e. intangible benefits). The participants acted agentively, not only reflecting on the benefits of tutoring but also on its disadvantages including creating pressure on their parents and themselves and being somewhat an unfair advantage in competition. From this qualitative study, pedagogical implications and areas for ongoing research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 531
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CHILDHOOD SOC INTRO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SHADOW ED CURRICULUM
[4]  
Armstrong D., 2007, CLASSROOM VISIONS EF
[5]  
BARTLEY J, 2017, CASE BRIEFING BRIEFI
[6]  
Braun Virginia., 2013, SAGE, DOI DOI 10.1177/0959353515614115
[7]  
Bray M., 2016, RES PRIVATE SUPPLEME
[8]  
Bray M., 2016, RES PRIVATE SUPPLEME, P149
[9]  
Bray M., 2011, CHALLENGE SHADOW ED
[10]  
Bray M., 2014, REGULATING PRIVATE T