The Limitations of Point of Care Testing for Pandemic Influenza: What Clinicians and Public Health Professionals Need to Know

被引:17
作者
Hatchette, Todd F. [1 ]
机构
[1] QE II Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Microbiol, Halifax, NS B3H 1V8, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2009年 / 100卷 / 03期
关键词
Pandemic influenza; seasonal influenza; point of care testing; nucleic acid amplification testing; DIRECTIGEN FLU-A+B; REAL-TIME PCR; A VIRUS; RAPID DETECTION; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; CELL-CULTURE; B VIRUSES; DIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; TEST KITS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/BF03405541
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
As the world prepares for the next influenza pandemic, governments have made significant funding commitments to vaccine development and antiviral stockpiling. While these are essential components to pandemic response, rapid and accurate diagnostic testing remains an often neglected cornerstone of pandemic influenza preparedness. Clinicians and Public Health Practitioners need to understand the benefits and drawbacks of different influenza tests in both seasonal and pandemic settings. Culture has been the traditional gold standard for influenza diagnosis but requires from 1-10 days to generate a positive result, compared to nucleic acid detection methods such as real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Although the currently available rapid antigen detection kits can generate results in less than 30 minutes, their sensitivity is suboptimal and they are not recommended for the detection of novel influenza viruses. Until point-of-care (POC) tests are improved, PILPN recommends that the best option for pandemic influenza preparation is the enhancement of nucleic acid-based testing capabilities across Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 207
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Abdel-Ghafar AN, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V358, P261, DOI 10.1056/NEJMra0707279
  • [2] Allen Upton D, 2006, Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol, V17, P273
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, WHO REC US RAP TEST
  • [4] Comparison of two rapid influenza A/B test kits with reference methods showing high specificity and sensitivity for influenza A infection
    Booth, S
    Baleriola, C
    Rawlinson, WD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2006, 78 (05) : 619 - 622
  • [5] *CAN PAND INFL PLA, 2006, ANN C PAND INFL LAB
  • [6] Comparative analytical sensitivities of six rapid influenza A antigen detection test kits for detection of influenza A subtypes H1N1H3N2 and H5N1
    Chan, K. H.
    Lam, S. Y.
    Puthavathana, P.
    Nguyen, T. D.
    Long, H. T.
    Pang, C. M.
    Chan, K. M.
    Cheung, C. Y.
    Seto, W. H.
    Peiris, J. S. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2007, 38 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [7] Evaluation of the Directigen FluA+B test for rapid diagnosis of influenza virus type A and B infections
    Chan, KH
    Maldeis, N
    Pope, W
    Yup, A
    Ozinskas, A
    Gill, J
    Seto, WH
    Shortridge, KF
    Peiris, JSM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) : 1675 - 1680
  • [8] Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods
    Covalciuc, KA
    Webb, KH
    Carlson, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (12) : 3971 - 3974
  • [9] Rapid assays for the diagnosis of influenza A and B viruses in patients evaluated at a large tertiary care children's hospital during two consecutive winter seasons
    Cruz, Andrea T.
    Cazacu, Andreea C.
    Greer, Jewel M.
    Dernmler, Gail J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2008, 41 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [10] ELLIS JS, 1997, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V35, P207