The construction and the initial validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale for the Personality Assessment Inventory

被引:39
作者
Gaasedelen, Owen J. [1 ,2 ]
Whiteside, Douglas M. [3 ]
Altmaier, Elizabeth [1 ]
Welch, Catherine [1 ]
Basso, Michael R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] New Mexico VA Hlth Care Syst, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Psychiat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Tulsa, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
关键词
Personality Assessment Inventory; symptom validity test; performance validity test; neuropsychological assessment; item response theory; FAKE BAD SCALE; HENRY-HEILBRONNER INDEX; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MMPI-2 VALIDITY SCALES; SYMPTOM VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE VALIDITY; INJURY LITIGANTS; RBS; UTILITY; PAI;
D O I
10.1080/13854046.2019.1612947
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: This study describes the derivation and initial validation evidence of a novel Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale designed to be sensitive to cognitive response bias, as defined by poor performance on performance validity tests (PVTs), in the context of neuropsychological assessment. The Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS) is a ten-item scale that was designed to discriminate between neuropsychological patients who passed or failed PVTs. Method: In a sample of 306 consecutive mixed neuropsychological outpatients, the CBS was derived by initially selecting items that significantly discriminated participants who passed and failed two or more PVTs, with further item refinement utilizing Item Response Theory methods. Results: Initial validation evidence suggests the CBS outperforms existing PAI symptom validity tests in predicting failure on two or more PVTs. The CBS showed good ability to discriminate between valid and invalid performance validity (Cohen's d = -0.96), with good classification accuracy (area under the curve = 0.72). Conclusions: Study results suggest the CBS may be useful in detecting cognitive response bias in a mixed neuropsychological outpatient sample; however, cross-validation will be necessary to further establish its utility.
引用
收藏
页码:1467 / 1484
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1954, J CONSULT PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0062776
[2]   Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome - Which is it? [J].
Arbisi, Paul A. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (08) :1406-1411
[3]   Symptom Validity Test Performance in U. S. Veterans Referred for Evaluation of Mild TBI [J].
Armistead-Jehle, Patrick .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) :52-59
[4]   Sensitivity and specificity of finger tapping test scores for the detection of suspect effort [J].
Arnold, G ;
Boone, KB ;
Lu, P ;
Dean, A ;
Wen, J ;
Nitch, S ;
McPherson, S .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 19 (01) :105-120
[5]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2011, MMPI 2 RF MINNESOTA
[6]   The MMPI-2 symptom validity scale (FBS) is an empirically validated measure of overreporting in personal injury litigants and claimants: Reply to butcher et al. (2008) [J].
Ben-Porath Y.S. ;
Greve K.W. ;
Bianchini K.J. ;
Kaufmann P.M. .
Psychological Injury and Law, 2009, 2 (1) :62-85
[7]  
Bianchini Kevin J, 2005, Spine J, V5, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.016
[8]   Cumulative False Positive Rates Given Multiple Performance Validity Tests: Commentary on Davis and Millis (2014) and Larrabee (2014) [J].
Bilder, Robert M. ;
Sugar, Catherine A. ;
Hellemann, Gerhard S. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 28 (08) :1212-1223
[9]  
Boone K.B., 2021, Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective, V2nd
[10]   Symptom validity assessment:: Practice issues and medical necessity -: NAN policy & planning committee [J].
Bush, SS ;
Ruff, RM ;
Tröster, AI ;
Barth, JT ;
Koffler, SP ;
Pliskin, NH ;
Reynolds, CR ;
Silver, CH .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) :419-426