High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

被引:70
作者
Yang, Yafan [1 ]
Wang, Guiying [1 ]
He, Jingli [1 ]
Zhang, Jianfeng [1 ]
Xi, Jinchuan [1 ]
Wang, Feifei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Gen Surg, Hlth Rd,12,North Bldg St, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Rectal cancer; Inferior mesenteric artery; High ligation; Low ligation; Meta-analysis; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; RECTAL-CANCER; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SIGMOID COLON; RISK-FACTORS; LIGATION; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colorectal cancer surgery includes "high tie" and "low tie" of the inferior mesenteric artery(IMA). However, different ligation level is closely related to the blood supply of anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate, and it is unclear which technique confers a lower anastomotic leakage rate(AL) and survival advantage. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and impact of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) high ligation versus IMA low ligation on anastomotic leakage, lymph nodes yield rates and 5-year survival. Methods: A list of these studies, published in English from 1990 to 2017, was obtained independently by two reviewers from databases such as PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. Anastomotic leakage rate, the yield of lymph nodes and 5-year survival were compared using Review Manager 5.3. Results: There was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage, number of lymph nodes retrieved and 5-year survival rate for both techniques. Conclusions: Neither the high tie nor the low tie strategy has an evidence in terms of anastomotic leakage rate, harvested lymph nodes, and the 5-year survival rate. Further RCT is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 24
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer [J].
Masui, H ;
Ike, H ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Oki, S ;
Shimada, H .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (10) :1140-1145
[22]   Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery [J].
Nelson, H ;
Petrelli, N ;
Carlin, A ;
Couture, J ;
Fleshman, J ;
Guillem, J ;
Miedema, B ;
Ota, D ;
Sargent, D .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (08) :583-596
[23]  
NEWLAND RC, 1987, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V60, P852, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<852::AID-CNCR2820600422>3.0.CO
[24]  
2-5
[25]   Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon [J].
Read, TE ;
Mutch, MG ;
Chang, BW ;
McNevin, MS ;
Fleshman, JW ;
Birnbaum, EH ;
Fry, RD ;
Caushaj, PF ;
Kodner, IJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 195 (01) :33-40
[26]  
ROSI PA, 1962, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V114, P15
[27]   High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage [J].
Rutegard, M. ;
Hemmingsson, O. ;
Matthiessen, P. ;
Rutegard, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (01) :127-132
[28]   Patterns of lymphatic spread in rectal cancer. A topographical analysis on lymph node metastases [J].
Steup, WH ;
Moriya, Y ;
van de Velde, CJH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (07) :911-918
[29]  
Sugihara K, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P1871, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1871::AID-CNCR5>3.3.CO
[30]  
2-9