Food first! Theorising assets and actors in agroforestry: risk evaders, opportunity seekers and 'the food imperative' in sub-Saharan Africa

被引:40
作者
Jerneck, Anne [1 ]
Olsson, Lennart [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
agroforestry adoption; carbon sequestration; climate change; entrepreneurs; food security; grounded theory; narrative walks; risk; sustainability science; time poverty; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ADOPTION; LINKING; FARMERS; POVERTY; SYSTEMS; ENTREPRENEURS; VULNERABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2012.751714
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Despite widely recognised and well-established benefits, it is difficult to adopt the multifunctional activity of agroforestry into the landscape and lifeworld of small-scale agriculture, if poverty, itself a main reason for adopting agroforestry, stands in its way. Based on participant observations and interviews with small-scale farmers in western Kenya, we explore and theorise agroforestry adoption as a process of socio-ecological and socio-technological change. Proceeding from sustainability science and a modified livelihoods approach we use grounded theory in narrative walks' to analyse adoption and non-adoption of agroforestry in a setting where farmers continuously interpret, adjust to and invest in their environment. Given the diversity and complexity of such livelihoods, the analysis is structured around reproductive and productive chains, strategies and practices defined by uncertainty and risk, and conflicting interests. Findings indicate that food secure farmers may act as entrepreneurially inclined opportunity seekers' and venture into agroforestry, whereas the food imperative'(alongside the health imperative') makes it more difficult for agroforestry to take root among the poorest of the poor' who act as risk evaders'. Hence, agroforestry adoption must be understood within an integrated human-environment frame recognising the socio-ecological relations of technology adoption and the wider political aspects and power structures of food security.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
[31]   The scramble in Africa: Reorienting rural livelihoods [J].
Bryceson, DF .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 30 (05) :725-739
[32]   The extended case method [J].
Burawoy, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 1998, 16 (01) :4-33
[33]   DIFFERENTIATING ENTREPRENEURS FROM SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS - A CONCEPTUALIZATION [J].
CARLAND, JW ;
HOY, F ;
BOULTON, WR ;
CARLAND, JAC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (02) :354-359
[34]  
Charmaz K., 2010, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series), DOI DOI 10.7748/NR.13.4.84.S4
[35]   Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana [J].
Conley, Timothy G. ;
Udry, Christopher R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :35-69
[36]  
Cornell JosephD., 2007, Encyclopedia of Earth
[37]   Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from Ethiopia [J].
Dercon, Stefan ;
Christiaensen, Luc .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 96 (02) :159-173
[38]  
Djurfeldt G, 2005, AFRICAN FOOD CRISIS: LESSONS FROM THE ASIAN GREEN REVOLUTION, P1, DOI 10.1079/9780851999982.0000
[39]  
Ellis F., 2000, RURAL LIVELIHOODS DI
[40]   The potential for soil carbon sequestration in three tropical dryland farming systems of Africa and Latin America:: A modelling approach [J].
Farage, P. K. ;
Ardoe, J. ;
Olsson, L. ;
Rienzi, E. A. ;
Ball, A. S. ;
Pretty, J. N. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2007, 94 (02) :457-472