On the use of trajectory log files for machine & patient specific QA

被引:11
作者
Chuang, Kai-Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Giles, William [3 ]
Adamson, Justus [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Kunshan Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Kunshan, Peoples R China
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
MLC; trajectory log file; log file-based QA; IMRT; RAPIDARC; ERRORS; VMAT;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/abc86c
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Trajectory log files are increasingly being utilized clinically for machine and patient specific QA. The process of converting the DICOM-RT plan to a deliverable trajectory by the linac control software introduces some uncertainty that is inherently incorporated into measurement-based patient specific QA but is not necessarily included for trajectory log file-based methods. Roughly half of prior studies have included this uncertainty in the analysis while the remaining studies have ignored it, and it has yet to be quantified in the literature. Methods: We collected DICOM-RT files from the treatment planning system and the trajectory log files from four TrueBeam linear accelerators for 25 IMRT and 10 VMAT plans. We quantified the DICOM-RT Conversion to Trajectory Residual (DCTR, difference between 'planned' MLC position from TPS DICOM-RT file and 'expected' MLC position (the deliverable MLC positions calculated by the linac control software) from trajectory log file) and compared it to the discrepancy between actual and expected machine parameters recorded in trajectory log files. Results: RMS of the DCTR was 0.0845 mm (range of RMS per field/arc: 0.0173-0.1825 mm) for 35 plans (114 fields/arcs) and was independent of treatment technique, with a maximum observed discrepancy at any control point of 0.7255 mm. DCTR was correlated with MLC velocity and was consistent over the course of treatment and over time, with a slight change in magnitude observed after a linac software upgrade. For comparison, the RMS of trajectory log file reported delivery error for moving MLCs was 0.0205 mm, thus DCTR is about four times the recorded delivery error in the trajectory log file. Conclusion: The uncertainty introduced from the conversion process by the linac control software from DICOM-RT plan to a deliverable trajectory is 3-4 times larger than the discrepancy between actual and expected machine parameters recorded in trajectory log files. This uncertainty should be incorporated into the analysis when using trajectory log file-based methods for analyzing MLC performance or patient-specific QA.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries [J].
Agnew, A. ;
Agnew, C. E. ;
Grattan, M. W. D. ;
Hounsell, A. R. ;
McGarry, C. K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (09) :N49-N63
[2]   Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output [J].
Agnew, C. E. ;
King, R. B. ;
Hounsell, A. R. ;
McGarry, C. K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (21) :6761-6777
[3]   Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT [J].
Agnew, Christina E. ;
Irvine, Denise M. ;
McGarry, Conor K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06) :204-216
[4]  
Alber M., 2008, ESTRO BOOKLET, V7
[5]  
[Anonymous], TRUEBRAM TRAJ LOG FI
[6]  
[Anonymous], MOBIUS3D INSTR US
[7]  
[Anonymous], LINACVIEW DAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], PERFRACTION PROC FLO
[9]   Is RapidArc more susceptible to delivery uncertainties than dynamic IMRT? [J].
Betzel, Gregory T. ;
Yi, Byong Yong ;
Niu, Ying ;
Yu, Cedric X. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) :5882-5890
[10]  
Bossuyt E, 2019, RAD ONC