A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months

被引:66
作者
Hyland, Paul [1 ]
Raymond, Elizabeth G. [2 ]
Chong, Erica [2 ]
机构
[1] Tabbot Fdn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Gynu Hlth Projects, 15 East 26th St,Suite 801, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
abortion; access; Australia; telemedicine; EARLY MEDICAL ABORTION; BUCCAL MISOPROSTOL; FOLLOW-UP; MIFEPRISTONE; TERMINATION; PREGNANCY; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12800
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn 2015, the Tabbot Foundation launched a nationwide direct-to-patient telemedicine service to enable women to obtain medical abortion without visiting an abortion provider. AimsWe aimed to describe results from the first 18months of this service. Materials and MethodsTo have an abortion through the Foundation, a woman obtained screening tests locally and had a telephone consultation with a Foundation doctor. If she was eligible, mifepristone, misoprostol and other medications were sent to her by mail. After taking the drugs, the woman obtained follow-up tests at local facilities and had a consultation with Foundation professionals. The Foundation charged $250 to patients with Medicare eligibility and $600 otherwise. We summarised clinical data collected by the service. ResultsBetween June 2015 and December 2016, 1010 women received medications, of whom 56% lived outside of major cities. Ninety-five percent of packages were sent within 15days after registration. Of the 965 women who took misoprostol, outcomes were definitively documented for 754 (78%), of whom 96% had a complete abortion without surgical intervention, and 95% had no face-to-face clinical encounter after treatment. Of women with Medicare cards, 72% paid no out-of-pocket charges other than to the Foundation. Nearly all women (781/802; 97%) were highly satisfied. ConclusionsThe direct-to-patient telemedicine medical abortion service was effective, safe, inexpensive and satisfactory. It disproportionately served women in parts of Australia with limited access to abortion facilities. This experience may be instructive for others desiring to use telemedicine to enhance access to abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Aiken ARA, 2016, BJOG, V124, P1208
  • [2] [Anonymous], BJOG
  • [3] ASGS, 2017, AUSTR STAT GEOGR STA
  • [4] Australian Government Department of Health, 2017, SURG 2016 FACTSH NHW
  • [5] Baird B, 2017, HEALTH HUM RIGHTS, V19, P197
  • [6] Medical abortion in Australia: a short history
    Baird, Barbara
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2015, 23 (46) : 169 - 176
  • [7] Medical abortion is fundamental to women's health care
    Black, Kirsten I.
    Bateson, Deborah
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (03) : 245 - 247
  • [8] Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves?
    Cameron, S. T.
    Glasier, A.
    Johnstone, A.
    Dewart, H.
    Campbell, A.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 91 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [9] Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion
    Chen, Melissa J.
    Rounds, Kacie M.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Cansino, Catherine
    Hou, Melody Y.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [10] Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion A Systematic Review
    Chen, Melissa J.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01) : 12 - 21