Effects of short-term upper limb immobilization on sensory information processing and corticospinal excitability

被引:2
作者
Okamoto, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Ishii, Daisuke [2 ,3 ]
Yamamoto, Satoshi [4 ]
Ishibashi, Kiyoshige [5 ]
Kohno, Yutaka [2 ]
Numata, Kenji [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058576, Japan
[2] Ibaraki Prefectural Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Med Sci, 4669-2 Ami, Ami, Ibaraki 3000394, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ, Dept Cognit Behav Physiol, Grad Sch Med, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chiba, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[4] Ibaraki Prefectural Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Sch Hlth Sci, 4669-2 Ami, Ami, Ibaraki 3000394, Japan
[5] Ibaraki Prefectural Univ Hlth Sci Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy, 4733 Ami, Ami, Ibaraki 3000331, Japan
[6] Tokyo Profess Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Koto Ku, 2-22-10 Shiohama, Tokyo 1350043, Japan
关键词
Short-term immobilization; Somatosensory-evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Short-interval intracortical inhibition; Intracortical facilitation; Long-interval intracortical inhibition; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE; PLASTICITY; PARIETAL; SEPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-022-06371-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Several studies have reported the effects of short-term immobilization of the upper limb on the excitability of the primary motor cortex. In a report examining the effects of upper limb immobilization on somatosensory information processing using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), short-term upper limb immobilization reduced the amplitude and increased the latency of the P45 component recorded over the contralateral sensorimotor cortex of SEPs. However, the effects of upper limb immobilization on other regions involved in somatosensory information processing are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the effects of short-term right upper limb immobilization on sensory information processing, particularly in motor-related areas, by measuring the cortical components of SEPs. We also evaluated the excitability of the primary motor cortex and corticospinal tract as well as motor performance (visual simple reaction time and pinch force) related to these areas. All subjects were divided into two groups: the SEP group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of somatosensory processing were investigated, and the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of the corticospinal tract and primary motor cortex were investigated. Motor performance was evaluated in all subjects. We showed that 10-h right upper limb immobilization increased the cortical component of SEPs (N30) in the SEP group and decreased the excitability of the corticospinal tract, but not of the primary motor cortex, in the TMS group. The pinch force decreased after upper limb immobilization. However, the visual simple reaction time did not change between pre- and post-immobilization. The supplementary motor area and premotor cortex are believed to be the source of the N30. Therefore, these results suggest that upper limb immobilization affected somatosensory information processing in motor-related areas. Moreover, 10-h right upper limb immobilization reduced the excitability of corticospinal tracts but not that of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that circuits outside the M1, such as the intra- and inter-hemispheric inhibitory and facilitatory circuits rather than circuits within the M1, may be responsible for the reduced excitability of the central nervous system after restraint.
引用
收藏
页码:1979 / 1989
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] POTENTIALS-EVOKED IN HUMAN AND MONKEY CEREBRAL-CORTEX BY STIMULATION OF THE MEDIAN NERVE - A REVIEW OF SCALP AND INTRACRANIAL RECORDINGS
    ALLISON, T
    MCCARTHY, G
    WOOD, CC
    JONES, SJ
    [J]. BRAIN, 1991, 114 : 2465 - 2503
  • [2] Use-Dependent Hemispheric Balance
    Avanzino, Laura
    Bassolino, Michela
    Pozzo, Thierry
    Bove, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (09) : 3423 - 3428
  • [3] Training the Motor Cortex by Observing the Actions of Others During Immobilization
    Bassolino, Michela
    Campanella, Martina
    Bove, Marco
    Pozzo, Thierry
    Fadiga, Luciano
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2014, 24 (12) : 3268 - 3276
  • [4] GATING OF THE EARLY COMPONENTS OF THE FRONTAL AND PARIETAL SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN DIFFERENT SENSORY-MOTOR INTERFERENCE MODALITIES
    CHERON, G
    BORENSTEIN, S
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 80 (06): : 522 - 530
  • [5] Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans
    Civardi, C
    Cantello, R
    Asselman, P
    Rothwell, JC
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (06) : 1444 - 1453
  • [6] CAST IMMOBILIZATION INCREASES LONG-INTERVAL INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION
    Clark, Brian C.
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Hoffman, Richard L.
    Dearth, Douglas J.
    Thomas, James S.
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2010, 42 (03) : 363 - 372
  • [7] Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials
    Cruccu, G.
    Aminoff, M. J.
    Curio, G.
    Guerit, J. M.
    Kakigi, R.
    Mauguiere, F.
    Rossini, P. M.
    Treede, R. -D.
    Garcia-Larrea, L.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (08) : 1705 - 1719
  • [8] SEPS TO FINGER JOINT INPUT LACK THE N20-P20 RESPONSE THAT IS EVOKED BY TACTILE INPUTS - CONTRAST BETWEEN CORTICAL GENERATORS IN AREA-3B AND AREA-2 IN HUMANS
    DESMEDT, JE
    OZAKI, I
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 80 (06): : 513 - 521
  • [9] COLOR IMAGING OF PARIETAL AND FRONTAL SOMATOSENSORY POTENTIAL FIELDS EVOKED BY STIMULATION OF MEDIAN OR POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE IN MAN
    DESMEDT, JE
    BOURGUET, M
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (01): : 1 - 17
  • [10] Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of the ring and little fingers
    Facchini, S
    Romani, M
    Tinazzi, M
    Aglioti, SM
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (03) : 367 - 375