Postmenopausal hormone therapy with estradiol and norethisterone acetate and mammographic density: findings from a cross-sectional study among Norwegian women

被引:18
作者
Stuedal, A. [1 ]
Ma, H. [2 ]
Bjorndal, H. [3 ]
Ursin, G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Nutr, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Populat Sci, Div Canc Etiol, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[3] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Norwegian Radium Hosp, BIK, NBCSP Akershus Vest, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; LOW DOSE; ESTRADIOL; NORETHISTERONE ACETATE; BREAST-CANCER RISK; ESTROGEN-PLUS-PROGESTIN; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS; REGIMENS;
D O I
10.1080/13697130802638458
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Although a number of studies have evaluated the associations between use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and mammographic density, few have assessed the effects of the medications containing estradiol (E2) plus norethisterone acetate (NETA). In particular, there are few data on the effects of the low-dose E2/NETA regimen. Methods We included data from 724 women, aged 50-70 years, residing in south-east Norway, who participated in a cross-sectional study conducted within the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. We assessed mammographic density using a previously validated computer-assisted method. Results After adjusting for age at screening, number of children and body mass index, women who currently used HT had 6.0% higher percent mammographic density than never-users, p0.0001. Women who used either low- or high-dose continuous combined E2/NETA regimens had 7.7% (p0.0001) and 8.8% (p0.0001) higher percent mammographic density than never-users, respectively. Conclusion Our study suggests that the effect of E2/NETA regimens on mammographic density could be at least as detrimental to the breast tissue as several other estrogen+progestin regimens. Our results suggest that both low- and high-dose E2/NETA influence mammographic density, but there were some indications in our analyses that the effect of low-dose E2/NETA could be slightly lower than that of the older high-dose regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 258
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Advance Data
[2]  
Atkinson C, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P863
[3]  
Beral Valerie, 2003, Lancet, V362, P419
[4]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[5]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[6]   Different types of postmenopausal hormone therapy and mammographic density in Norwegian women [J].
Bremnes, Yngve ;
Ursin, Giske ;
Bjurstam, Nils ;
Lund, Eiliv ;
Gram, Inger Torhild .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 120 (04) :880-884
[7]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629
[8]   Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast, cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women - The Women's Health Initiative Randomized trial [J].
Chlebowski, RT ;
Hendrix, SL ;
Langer, RD ;
Stefanick, ML ;
Gass, M ;
Lane, D ;
Rodabough, RJ ;
Gilligan, MA ;
Cyr, MG ;
Thomson, CA ;
Khandekar, J ;
Petrovitch, H ;
McTiernan, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (24) :3243-3253
[9]   The effect of low dose hormone therapy on mammographic breast density [J].
Christodoulakos, GE ;
Lambrinoudaki, IV ;
Vourtsi, AD ;
Vlachou, S ;
Creatsa, M ;
Panoulis, KPC ;
Botsis, D .
MATURITAS, 2006, 54 (01) :78-85
[10]   The effect of various regimens of hormone replacement therapy on mammographic breast density [J].
Christodoulakos, GE ;
Lambrinoudaki, IV ;
Panoulis, KPC ;
Vourtsi, AD ;
Vlachos, L ;
Georgiou, E ;
Creatsas, GC .
MATURITAS, 2003, 45 (02) :109-118