Exposure to secondhand smoke and voluntary adoption of smoke-free home and car rules among non-smoking South African adults

被引:14
作者
Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A. [1 ,2 ]
Olufajo, Olubode [3 ]
Agaku, Israel T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Sch Hlth Syst & Publ Hlth, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Limpopo, Sch Oral Hlth Sci, Off Director, Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Ctr Global Tobacco Control, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Smoking; Policy; Secondhand smoke; Bans; Cars; Homes; Tobacco; Cigarettes; Smoke-free; Non-smokers; LEGISLATION; CONSUMPTION; CIGARETTE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-14-580
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure is a well-established health hazard. To determine the effectiveness of existing smoke-free policies and adoption of smoke-free rules in South Africa, we assessed exposure to SHS from several sources among non-smoking adults during 2010. Methods: Data were analyzed for 3,094 adults aged >= 16 years who participated in the 2010 South African Social Attitudes Survey. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were used to assess presence of smoke-free rules among all South Africans, and prevalence and correlates of SHS exposure at work, at home, and at hospitality venues among non-smokers. Results: Overall, 70.6% of all South African adults had 100% smoke-free rules in their private cars, 62.5% in their homes, while 63.9% worked in places with 100% smoke-free policies. Overall, 55.9% of all non-smokers reported exposure to SHS from at least one source (i.e., in the home, workplace or at a hospitality venue). By specific source of exposure, 18.4% reported being exposed to SHS at work, 25.2% at home, 33.4% in a restaurant, and 32.7% at a bar. Presence of work bans on indoor smoking conferred lower likelihood of SHS exposure at work among non-smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09-0.60). Similarly, smoke-free home rules decreased the odds of being exposed to SHS at home among non-smokers (aOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.09-0.30). Conclusion: Over half of South African adults reported SHS exposure in the home or at public places such as the workplace and at hospitality venues. This underscores the need for comprehensive smoke-free laws that prohibit smoking in all public indoor areas without exemptions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: A report of the Surgeon General
[2]  
[Anonymous], PART WHO FRAM CONV T
[3]   Tobacco smoke pollution in the 'non-smoking' sections of selected popular restaurants in Pretoria, South Africa [J].
Ayo-Yusuf, Olalekan A. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2014, 23 (03) :193-194
[4]   The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States [J].
Chapman, S ;
Borland, R ;
Scollo, M ;
Brownson, RC ;
Dominello, A ;
Woodward, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (07) :1018-1023
[5]  
Gerlach K K, 1997, Tob Control, V6, P199
[6]   Comparative impact of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in three European countries [J].
Nagelhout, Gera E. ;
de Vries, Hein ;
Boudreau, Christian ;
Allwright, Shane ;
McNeill, Ann ;
van den Putte, Bas ;
Fong, Geoffrey T. ;
Willemsen, Marc C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 :4-9
[7]   The role of anti-smoking legislation on cigarette and alcohol consumption habits in Italy [J].
Pieroni, Luca ;
Chiavarini, Manuela ;
Minelli, Liliana ;
Salmasi, Luca .
HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 111 (02) :116-126
[8]  
South African National Department of Health, TOB CONTR S AFR BACK
[9]  
Sweeney C T, 2000, J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972), V55, P311
[10]   Environmental tobacco smoke in hospitality venues in Greece [J].
Vardavas, Constantine I. ;
Kondilis, Barbara ;
Travers, Mark J. ;
Petsetaki, Elisabeth ;
Tountas, Yiannis ;
Kafatos, Anthony G. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)