Health promotion at the workplace setting: a protocol for a systematic review of effectiveness and sustainability of current practice in low-income and middle-income countries

被引:1
作者
Wanjau, Mary Njeri [1 ,2 ]
Zapata-Diomedi, Belen [2 ,3 ]
Veerman, Lennert [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nairobi, Sch Nursing, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Southport, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
PUBLIC-HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; WORK; PREVENTION; STRATEGIES; PROGRAMS; FITNESS; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are experiencing a growing disease burden due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Changing behavioural practices, such as diets high in saturated fat, salt and sugar and sedentary lifestyles, have been associated with the increase in NCDs. Health promotion at the workplace setting is considered effective in the fight against NCDs and has been reported to yield numerous benefits. However, there is a need to generate evidence on the effectiveness and sustainability of workplace health promotion practice specific to LMICs. We aim to synthesise the current literature on workplace health promotion in LMICs focusing on interventions effectiveness and sustainability. Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review of published studies from LMICs up to 31 March 2019. We will search the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and CINAHL. Two reviewers will independently screen potential articles for inclusion and disagreements will be resolved by consensus. We will appraise the quality and risk of bias of included studies using two tools from the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. We will present a narrative overview and assessment of the body of evidence derived from the comprehensive review of the studies. The reported outcomes will be summarised by study design, duration, intensity/frequency of intervention delivery and by the six-priority health promotion action areas set out in the Ottawa Charter. We will conduct a thematic analysis to identify the focus areas of current interventions. This systematic review protocol has been prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses for Protocols 2015 statement. Ethics and dissemination This study does not require ethics approval. We will disseminate the results of this review through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], AM J HLTH PROMOT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, Workers' Health: Global Plan of Action
  • [3] [Anonymous], RAYYAN WEB MOBILE AP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, Chronic diseases and health promotion
  • [6] [Anonymous], WORKPL HLTH PROM
  • [7] [Anonymous], HLTH PROM JAK DECL L
  • [8] [Anonymous], STEWART PRISMA P GRO
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2014, AFR REG HLTH REP
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2022, HLTH COND RISKS