Interpretation Across Legal Systems

被引:5
作者
Malerba, Alessandra [1 ]
Rotolo, Antonino [1 ]
Governatori, Guido [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, CIRSFID, Bologna, Italy
[2] CSIRO, Data61, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2016年 / 294卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Legal Interpretation; Defeasible Reasoning; Private International Law;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-726-9-83
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper we extend a formal framework presented in [6] to model reasoning across legal systems. In particular, we propose a logical system that encompasses the various interpretative interactions occurring between legal systems in the context of private international law. This is done by introducing meta-rules to reason with interpretive canons.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Antoniou G., 2001, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, V2, P255, DOI [10.1145/371316.371517, DOI 10.1145/371316.371517]
[2]  
Hage J., 2015, 7 MAASTR EUR PRIV LA
[3]   The modular logic of private international law [J].
Dung P.M. ;
Sartor G. .
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2011, 19 (2-3) :233-261
[4]  
Prakken H., 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law, V4, P331, DOI 10.1007/BF00118496
[5]   Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective [J].
Prakken, Henry ;
Sartor, Giovanni .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 227 :214-245
[6]  
Rotolo A., 2015, P 15 INT C ARTIFICIA, P99
[7]  
Sartor G., 2005, LEGAL REASONING COGN
[8]   An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation [J].
Walton, Douglas ;
Sartor, Giovanni ;
Macagno, Fabrizio .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2016, 24 (01) :51-91