Management of Complicated Appendicitis During Pregnancy in the US

被引:28
作者
Ashbrook, Matthew [1 ]
Cheng, Vincent [1 ]
Sandhu, Kulmeet [2 ]
Matsuo, Koji [3 ]
Schellenberg, Morgan [1 ]
Inaba, Kenji [1 ]
Matsushima, Kazuhide [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, 2051 Marengo St,Inpatient Tower,C5L100, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY; OUTCOMES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; DIAGNOSIS; ABSCESS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7555
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Data are sparse regarding the optimal treatment for complicated appendicitis during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE To compare nonoperative and operative management in complicated appendicitis during pregnancy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted using National Inpatient Sample data from between January 2003 and September 2015. This database approximates a 20% stratified sample of US inpatient hospital discharges. Included individuals were pregnant women discharged with the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. Data were analyzed from February 2020 through February 2022. EXPOSURES Study patients were categorized into 3 groups: those with successful nonoperative management, failed nonoperative management with delayed operation, or immediate operation for complicated appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical outcomes, including maternal infectious complications and perinatal complications, hospital length of stay, and total hospital charges. RESULTS Among 8087 pregnant women with complicated appendicitis (median [IQR] age, 27 [22-32] years), nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis was successful among 954 patients (11.8%) and failed among 2646 patients (32.7%). who underwent delayed operation; 4487 patients (55.5%) underwent immediate operation. In multivariate analysis, successful nonoperative management was associated with higher odds of amniotic infection (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% CI, 2.22-8.53; P < .001) and sepsis (OR. 1.52: 95% CI, 1.10-2.11; P = .01) compared with immediate operation, while there was no significant difference in preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion. However, failed nonoperative management that required delayed operation was associated with higher odds of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion compared with immediate operation (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.24-1.68; P < .001). Immediate operation was associated with decreased hospital charges compared with nonoperative management that was successful (regression coefficient [RC], 0.09; 95% CI, 0.07-0.11; P < .001) and that failed (RC. 0.12; 95% CI: 0.11-0.14; P < .001). In subgroup multivariate logistic regression analysis, each day in delay to surgery was associated with an increase in odds of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion by 23% (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.18-1.29; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that immediate operation for complicated appendicitis in pregnant women was associated with lower odds of maternal infectious complications without higher odds of perinatal or other maternal complications compared with successful nonoperative management. Failed nonoperative management was associated with worse clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, OV NAT NAT INP SAMPL
  • [12] Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, NEOMAT NEON MAT ICD
  • [13] Comparative methods for handling missing data in large databases
    Henry, Antonia J.
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    Nguyen, Louis L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (05) : 1353 - +
  • [14] SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy
    Korndorffer, James R., Jr.
    Fellinger, Erika
    Reed, William
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (04): : 757 - 761
  • [15] Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy - Not realistic
    Kouwenhoven, EA
    van Driel, OJR
    van Erp, WFM
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (07): : 923 - 926
  • [16] Risk of Appendiceal Neoplasm in Periappendicular Abscess in Patients Treated With Interval Appendectomy vs Follow-up With Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1-Year Outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mallinen, Jari
    Rautio, Tero
    Gronroos, Juha
    Rantanen, Tuomo
    Nordstrom, Pia
    Savolainen, Heini
    Ohtonen, Pasi
    Hurme, Saija
    Salminen, Paulina
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (03) : 200 - 207
  • [17] Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mentula, Panu
    Sammalkorpi, Henna
    Leppaniemi, Ari
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [18] Appendicitis in pregnancy: New information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs
    Mourad, J
    Elliott, JP
    Erickson, L
    Lisboa, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) : 1027 - 1029
  • [19] Complicated appendicitis: Immediate operation or trial of nonoperative management?
    Nimmagadda, Neha
    Matsushima, Kazuhide
    Piccinini, Alice
    Park, Caroline
    Strumwasser, Aaron
    Lam, Lydia
    Inaba, Kenji
    Demetriades, Demetrios
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (04) : 713 - 717
  • [20] Orbay H., 2019, NON OBSTETRIC SURG P, P135