Aircraft Noise Emission Model Accounting for Aircraft Flight Parameters

被引:40
作者
Zellmann, C. [1 ]
Schaeffer, B. [1 ]
Wunderli, J. M. [1 ]
Isermann, U. [2 ]
Paschereit, C. O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Empa, Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Lab Acoust Noise Control, Uberlandstr 129, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] German Aerosp Ctr, DLR, Inst Aerodynam & Flow Technol, Bunsenstr 10, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Berlin Univ Technol, Inst Fluid Dynam & Tech Acoust, Muller Breslau Str 8, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2018年 / 55卷 / 02期
关键词
PREDICTION;
D O I
10.2514/1.C034275
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Today's aircraft noise calculation programs either use simple sound source descriptions with few input parameters or highly sophisticated models with input parameters, which are difficult to obtain. To fill the gap between these two approaches, an aircraft noise emission model based on regression of measured noise with aircraft flight parameters is presented. To find a reasonable compromise between the degree of detail and number of required flight parameters, an extensive data exploration was conducted. The most relevant parameters were incorporated in two multiple linear regression models, one for airframe and one for engine noise sources. An iterative method allowed fitting both regression models to aircraft flyover measurements. In total, aircraft noise emission models for 19 aircraft types were established, which underlines the general applicability of the modeling approach to turbofan-powered aircraft. Example comparisons between measurements and model predictions for two aircraft types revealed that the model accurately reproduces directivity and spectra for different flight configurations. In addition, it is suitable for the assessment and optimization of noise abatement procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 695
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of Combination Forecasting Model in Aircraft Failure Rate Forecasting
    Li, WenQiang
    Zhang, Chang
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [32] Comparison of the Aircraft Noise Calculation Programs sonAIR, FLULA2 and AEDT with Noise Measurements of Single Flights
    Meister, Jonas
    Schalcher, Stefan
    Wunderli, Jean-Marc
    Jaeger, David
    Zellmann, Christoph
    Schaeffer, Beat
    AEROSPACE, 2021, 8 (12)
  • [33] Surrogate model for viscous drag in aircraft empennage conceptual design
    de Lucas, S.
    Vega, J. M.
    Velazquez, A.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [34] Aircraft noise in situations with grazing sound incidence-Comparing different modeling approaches
    Wunderli, Jean Marc
    Meister, Jonas
    Jaeger, David
    Schalcher, Stefan
    Zellmann, Christoph
    Schaffer, Beat
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2022, 151 (05) : 3140 - 3151
  • [35] Benchmarking the aircraft noise mapping package developed for a unified urban environmental modelling tool
    Ang, Linus Yinn Leng
    Cui, Fangsen
    Poh, Hee Joo
    NOISE MAPPING, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [36] Augmented flight dynamics model for pilot workload evaluation in tilt-rotor aircraft optimal landing procedure after one engine failure
    Yan, Xufei
    Chen, Renliang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2019, 32 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [37] An Interacting Multiple Model based Aircraft Trajectory Conformance Prediction Method
    Wang, Zhuojia
    Zhang, Xuejun
    Cai, Kaiquan
    2018 IEEE/AIAA 37TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2018, : 575 - 583
  • [38] Single-Use Aircraft Launch System with Small Helium Balloon for 1 kPa Flight Testing
    Otsuka, Hikaru
    Ueno, Hiromi
    Oishi, Renta
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Nakayama, Ryoma
    Tokutake, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS, 2024, 36 (05) : 1167 - 1178
  • [39] System Noise Assessment of Hybrid Wing-Body Aircraft with Open-Rotor Propulsion
    Guo, Yueping
    Thomas, Russell H.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (06): : 1767 - 1779
  • [40] The sonRAIL emission model for railway noise in Switzerland
    Thron, T.
    Hecht, M.
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2010, 96 (05) : 873 - 883