Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance

被引:266
作者
Botzen, W. J. W. [1 ]
Aerts, J. C. J. H. [1 ]
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Econ & Econ Hist, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Climate change; Damage mitigation; Flood insurance; Geographical characteristics; Risk perception; The Netherlands; PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS; FLOOD; NETHERLANDS; UNCERTAINTY; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; LESSONS; RELIEF; MEUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Climate change is projected to increase flood risks in certain regions due to an increase in both precipitation and sea level rise. In addition, socio-economic scenarios project an increase in urbanization in flood prone areas, which results in a higher damage potential. The combined effect of climate and land use change on flood risks requires innovative adaptation policies to cope with rising risks. Increasingly, attention is paid to the role insurance can play in mitigating damage by providing incentives to policyholders to undertake damage reducing measures. The willingness of homeowners in the Netherlands to undertake measures that mitigate flood damage in exchange for benefits on hypothetical flood insurance policies is examined using surveys. The results indicate that many homeowners are willing to make investments in mitigation. In particular, approximately two-thirds are willing to invest in water barriers in exchange for a premium reduction and about a fifth are willing to replace floor types that are vulnerable to flooding with water resistant floor types. Furthermore, about a quarter are willing to move central heating installations to floors safe against flooding in favor of a reduction in the insurance premium. Estimates of the effectiveness of these mitigation measures to limit potential flood damage in the river delta indicate that prevented damage could be substantial, namely in the order of I billion euro or larger. Reductions in (absolute) flood risk due to mitigation are especially large under climate change. A probit model indicates that existing arrangements for compensating flood damage, risk awareness and perceptions, and geographical characteristics are important determinants in the decision to undertake mitigation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2265 / 2277
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Sensitivity of global river discharges under Holocene and future climate conditions [J].
Aerts, J. C. J. H. ;
Renssen, H. ;
Ward, P. J. ;
de Moel, H. ;
Odada, E. ;
Bouwer, L. M. ;
Goosse, H. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (19)
[2]  
Aerts J.C. J. H., 2008, Aandacht voor Veiligheid
[3]  
Aerts JCJH, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
[4]   Ice-sheet and sea-level changes [J].
Alley, RB ;
Clark, PU ;
Huybrechts, P ;
Joughin, I .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5747) :456-460
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NONSTR FLOOD PLAIN M
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Statline
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Econometric Methods with Applications in Business and Economics
[8]  
Blumenschein K, 2008, ECON J, V118, P114
[9]   Insurance against climate change and flooding in the Netherlands: Present, future, and comparison with other countries [J].
Botzen, W. J. W. ;
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (02) :413-426
[10]  
Botzen W. J. W., 2008, REPORT SURVEY PERCEP