On the application of Euler deconvolution to the analytic signal

被引:59
作者
Florio, G.
Fedi, M.
Pasteka, R.
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dipartimento Sci Terra, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[2] Comenius Univ, Dept Appl & Environm Geophys, Fac Sci, Bratislava 84215, Slovakia
关键词
MAGNETIC INTERPRETATION; 3; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1190/1.2360204
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Standard Euler deconvolution is applied to potential-field functions that are homogeneous and harmonic. Homogeneity is necessary to satisfy the Euler deconvolution equation itself, whereas harmonicity is required to compute the vertical derivative from data collected on a horizontal plane, according to potential-field theory. The analytic signal modulus of a potential field is a homogeneous function but is not a harmonic function. Hence, the vertical derivative of the analytic signal is incorrect when computed by the usual techniques for harmonic functions and so also is the consequent Euler deconvolution. We show that the resulting errors primarily affect the structural index and that the estimated values are always notably lower than the correct ones. The consequences of this error in the structural index are equally important whether the structural index is given as input (as in standard Euler deconvolution) or represents an unknown to be solved for. The analysis of a case history confirms serious errors in the estimation of structural index if the vertical derivative of the analytic signal is computed as for harmonic functions. We suggest computing the first vertical derivative of the analytic signal modulus, taking into account its nonharmonicity, by using a simple finite-difference algorithm. When the vertical derivative of the analytic signal is computed by finite differences, the depth to source and the structural index consistent with known source parameters are, in fact, obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:L87 / L93
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Euler deconvolution applied to potential field gradients [J].
Cooper, Gordon R. J. .
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 35 (03) :165-170
[2]   Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method [J].
Fedi, M ;
Florio, G .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2001, 49 (01) :40-58
[3]  
FEDI M, 2002, EUR GEOPH SOC 27 GEN
[4]  
FLORIO G, 2004, NEAR SURF 2004
[5]  
Gradshteyn I. S., 2014, TABLE INTEGRALS SERI
[6]  
Grant F., 1965, INTERPRETATION THEOR
[7]   GRADIENT MEASUREMENTS IN AEROMAGNETIC SURVEYING [J].
HOOD, P .
GEOPHYSICS, 1965, 30 (05) :891-&
[8]   Imaging magnetic sources using Euler's equation [J].
Hsu, SK .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2002, 50 (01) :15-25
[9]  
HUANG D, 1995, 57 C EXH EAGE
[10]   Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation [J].
Keating, P ;
Pilkington, M .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2004, 52 (03) :165-182