Awareness of behavioral, cognitive, and physical deficits in acute traumatic brain injury

被引:86
作者
Hart, T
Sherer, M
Whyte, J
Polansky, M
Novack, TA
机构
[1] Jefferson Med Coll, Moss Rehabil Res Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Rehabil Med, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Methodist Rehabil Ctr, Jackson, MS USA
[4] MCP Hahnemann Sch Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2004年 / 85卷 / 09期
关键词
awareness; brain injuries; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.030
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare awareness of deficit in 3 domains of function (physical, cognitive, behavioral/emotional) in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI), controlling for severity of impairment in the different domains. Design: Inception cohort. Setting: Three inpatient rehabilitation programs. Participants: People with acute TBI (N=161), tested as soon as feasible after posttraumatic amnesia. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Awareness Questionnaire (AQ) completed by the person with TBI and the treating neuropsychologist; and self- and clinician-rating scores calculated in the 3 domains. Results: For participants who were rated by clinicians as more impaired in at least 1 domain (ie, scored lower on the AQ), self-ratings differed significantly from one another in all 3 domains, with behavioral self-ratings highest, physical self-ratings lowest, and cognitive self-ratings intermediate. In subgroups of participants rated at the same level by clinicians in all 3 domains, physical self-ratings were also lowest, that is, more consonant with clinician ratings. Participants tended to rate themselves as relatively unchanged in cognitive and behavioral domains regardless of the level of clinician ratings on these factors. Conclusions: Patterns of discrepant awareness of deficit in different functional areas seen in postacute TBI also appear to be present acutely and are not entirely related to differential severity of deficit. We discuss several possible reasons for discrepant awareness of deficit, including differences in internal and external feedback, cultural and psychologic factors, and different levels of ambiguity inherent in causal explanations for different types of problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1450 / 1456
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Anderson SW., 1989, CLIN NEUROPSYCHOL, V3, P327, DOI DOI 10.1080/13854048908401482
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory: NFI
[3]   Self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of measures and their relationship to executive functions [J].
Bogod, NM ;
Mateer, CA ;
MacDonald, SWS .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 9 (03) :450-458
[4]   THE 5 YEAR OUTCOME OF SEVERE BLUNT HEAD-INJURY - A RELATIVES VIEW [J].
BROOKS, N ;
CAMPSIE, L ;
SYMINGTON, C ;
BEATTIE, A ;
MCKINLAY, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 49 (07) :764-770
[5]   Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research [J].
Cusick, CP ;
Gerhart, KA ;
Mellick, DC .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2000, 15 (01) :739-749
[6]  
Dahmer ER., 1993, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V8, P12, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004]
[7]   A longitudinal study of self-awareness: Functional deficits underestimated by persons with brain injury [J].
Fleming, J ;
Strong, J .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1999, 19 (01) :3-17
[8]  
Fleming JM, 1996, BRAIN INJURY, V10, P1
[9]   CHANGES IN PERSPECTIVES OF DISABILITY AMONG PATIENTS, STAFF, AND RELATIVES DURING REHABILITATION OF BRAIN INJURY [J].
FORDYCE, DJ ;
ROUECHE, JR .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 31 (04) :217-229
[10]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st