A Mixed-Method Study of How Instructors Design for Learning in Online and Distance Education

被引:6
作者
Quan Nguyen [1 ]
Rienties, Bart [2 ]
Whitelock, Denise [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Open Univ, Inst Educ Technol, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Learning design; learning analytics; mixed-method; ANALYTICS; TEACHERS; SATISFACTION; TECHNOLOGY; LANGUAGE; WORKLOAD; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2020.73.6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The use of analytical methods from learning analytics (LA) research combined with visualizations of learning activities using learning design (LD) tools and frameworks has provided important insight into how instructors design for learning. Nonetheless, there are many subtle nuances in instructors' design decisions that might not easily be captured using LA tools. Therefore, this study sets out to explore how and why instructors design for learning in an online and distance higher education setting by employing a mixed-method approach, which combined semi-structured interviews of 12 instructors with network analyses of their LDs. Our findings uncovered several underlying factors that influenced how instructors designed their modules and highlighted some discrepancies between instructors' pedagogical beliefs and their actual LD as captured by the Open University Learning Design Initiative (OULDI). This study showcases the potential of combining LA with qualitative insights for a better understanding of the complex design process in online distance higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 78
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Dalziel J., 2015, Learning design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315693101
  • [12] Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges
    Ferguson, Rebecca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2012, 4 (5-6) : 304 - 317
  • [13] Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Dawson, Shane
    Rogers, Tim
    Gasevic, Danijela
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 28 : 68 - 84
  • [14] Goodyear P., 2015, HERDSA REV HIGH ED, V2, P27, DOI DOI 10.1111/HEA.12037_26
  • [15] Griffiths D, 2017, INTERACT DES ARCHIT, P113
  • [16] Hernandez LeoD., 2018, Frontiers in ICT, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3389/FICT.2018.00009, 10.3389/fict.2018]
  • [17] Informing learning design through analytics: Applying network graph analysis
    Ifenthaler, Dirk
    Gibson, David
    Dobozy, Eva
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 117 - 132
  • [18] Joffe H., 2012, Handbook of Research Methods in Health and Social Sciences, V1, P210, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103, 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6103-1, 10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1, 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
  • [19] Educational modelling language: modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning
    Koper, R
    Manderveld, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 35 (05) : 537 - 551
  • [20] Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research
    Kreijns, K
    Kirschner, PA
    Jochems, W
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2003, 19 (03) : 335 - 353