A Mixed-Method Study of How Instructors Design for Learning in Online and Distance Education

被引:6
作者
Quan Nguyen [1 ]
Rienties, Bart [2 ]
Whitelock, Denise [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Open Univ, Inst Educ Technol, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Learning design; learning analytics; mixed-method; ANALYTICS; TEACHERS; SATISFACTION; TECHNOLOGY; LANGUAGE; WORKLOAD; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2020.73.6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The use of analytical methods from learning analytics (LA) research combined with visualizations of learning activities using learning design (LD) tools and frameworks has provided important insight into how instructors design for learning. Nonetheless, there are many subtle nuances in instructors' design decisions that might not easily be captured using LA tools. Therefore, this study sets out to explore how and why instructors design for learning in an online and distance higher education setting by employing a mixed-method approach, which combined semi-structured interviews of 12 instructors with network analyses of their LDs. Our findings uncovered several underlying factors that influenced how instructors designed their modules and highlighted some discrepancies between instructors' pedagogical beliefs and their actual LD as captured by the Open University Learning Design Initiative (OULDI). This study showcases the potential of combining LA with qualitative insights for a better understanding of the complex design process in online distance higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 78
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, FINAL PROJECT REPORT
  • [2] AUTCLearningDesign, 2002, PRED OBS EXP DES CON
  • [3] A Conceptual Framework linking Learning Design with Learning Analytics
    Bakharia, Aneesha
    Corrin, Linda
    de Barba, Paula
    Kennedy, Gregor
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Mulder, Raoul
    Williams, David
    Dawson, Shane
    Lockyer, Lori
    [J]. LAK '16 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE,, 2016, : 329 - 338
  • [4] Technology tools to support learning design: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers' design practices
    Bennett, Sue
    Agostinho, Shirley
    Lockyer, Lori
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 81 : 211 - 220
  • [5] Borgatti S. P., 2002, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies, DOI [10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01613.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0310.2009.01613.X]
  • [6] WORKLOAD AND THE QUALITY OF STUDENT LEARNING
    CHAMBERS, E
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1992, 17 (02) : 141 - 153
  • [7] Online Course Student Collaboration Literature: A Review and Critique
    Cherney, Maura R.
    Fetherston, Michelle
    Johnsen, Lauren Jean
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2018, 49 (01) : 98 - 128
  • [8] Conole G., 2013, Designing for learning in an open world
  • [9] Creswell J. W., 2013, QUAL INQ, V3rd ed. ed., DOI DOI 10.1089/TMJ.2009.0067
  • [10] Dalziel J., 2003, Proc.of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2003), P593