Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners

被引:221
作者
Belderbos, Rene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cassiman, Bruno [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Faems, Dries [1 ,6 ]
Leten, Bart [1 ,7 ]
Van Looy, Bart [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] IESE Business Sch, Barcelona, Spain
[5] CEPR, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[7] FWO Flanders, Vlaanderen, Belgium
[8] Univ Twente, IGS, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Co-ownership; Co-patenting; Intellectual property; Value creation; Value appropriation; Open innovation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MARKET VALUE; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; CONTRACT DESIGN; CONTROL RIGHTS; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; INDICATORS; CITATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Combining both interview data and empirical analyses at the patent and firm levels, we explore the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of R&D collaboration resulting in the co-ownership of intellectual property (i.e. co-patents). We make an explicit distinction between three different types of co-patenting partners: intra-industry partners, inter-industry partners, and universities. Our findings indicate that the value-appropriation challenges of IP sharing are clearly evident with intra-industry co-patenting, where partners are more likely to encounter overlapping exploitation domains. Co-patenting with universities is associated with higher market value, since appropriation challenges are unlikely to play a role and collaboration may signal novel technological opportunities. Although we find some evidence that co-patenting corresponds to higher (patent) value, patents co-owned with firms are significantly less likely to receive self-citations, indicating constraints on the future exploitation and development of co-owned technologies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 852
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]  
Azzaleo A., 2012, STI C LEID 2010 KU L, P2012
[12]   PATENTS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE - A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE [J].
BASBERG, BL .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1987, 16 (2-4) :131-141
[13]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[14]   Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Diederen, B ;
Lokshin, B ;
Veugelers, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 22 (8-9) :1237-1263
[15]   Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Faems, Dries ;
Leten, Bart ;
Van Looy, Bart .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (06) :869-882
[16]   Cumulative Innovation and Market Value: Evidence from Patent Citations [J].
Belenzon, Sharon .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 122 (559) :265-285
[17]   OFFSETTING ILLEGITIMACY? HOW PRESSURES FROM SECURITIES ANALYSTS INFLUENCE INCUMBENTS IN THE FACE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES [J].
Benner, Mary J. ;
Ranganathan, Ram .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (01) :213-233
[18]   Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms [J].
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1999, 66 (03) :529-554
[19]  
Carlson D., 1999, IDEA, V39, P251
[20]   Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration [J].
Carson, SJ ;
Madhok, A ;
Varman, R ;
John, G .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) :45-56