Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners

被引:221
作者
Belderbos, Rene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cassiman, Bruno [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Faems, Dries [1 ,6 ]
Leten, Bart [1 ,7 ]
Van Looy, Bart [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] IESE Business Sch, Barcelona, Spain
[5] CEPR, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Groningen, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[7] FWO Flanders, Vlaanderen, Belgium
[8] Univ Twente, IGS, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Co-ownership; Co-patenting; Intellectual property; Value creation; Value appropriation; Open innovation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MARKET VALUE; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; CONTRACT DESIGN; CONTROL RIGHTS; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; INDICATORS; CITATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Combining both interview data and empirical analyses at the patent and firm levels, we explore the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of R&D collaboration resulting in the co-ownership of intellectual property (i.e. co-patents). We make an explicit distinction between three different types of co-patenting partners: intra-industry partners, inter-industry partners, and universities. Our findings indicate that the value-appropriation challenges of IP sharing are clearly evident with intra-industry co-patenting, where partners are more likely to encounter overlapping exploitation domains. Co-patenting with universities is associated with higher market value, since appropriation challenges are unlikely to play a role and collaboration may signal novel technological opportunities. Although we find some evidence that co-patenting corresponds to higher (patent) value, patents co-owned with firms are significantly less likely to receive self-citations, indicating constraints on the future exploitation and development of co-owned technologies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 852
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Ahuja G, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-B
[3]  
AIPPI, 2007, SUMM REP QUEST Q194
[4]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[5]   Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows:: The influence of examiner citations [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2006, 88 (04) :774-779
[6]   Applicant and examiner citations in US patents: An overview and analysis [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle ;
Sampat, Bhaven .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :415-427
[7]   Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance [J].
Anderson, SW ;
Dekker, HC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (12) :1734-1752
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ACAD MANAGE J
[9]  
Arora A., 2013, STRATEGIC M IN PRESS
[10]   What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms [J].
Arundel, A ;
Kabla, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (02) :127-141