A variational approach to embed 1D beam models into 3D solid continua

被引:7
|
作者
Turello, D. F. [1 ,4 ]
Sanchez, P. J. [3 ,4 ]
Blanco, P. J. [5 ,6 ]
Pinto, F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Cordoba FCEFyN, Av Velez Sarsfield 1611, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[2] IDIT UNC CONICET, Av Velez Sarsfield 1611, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[3] CIMEC UNL CONICET, RN 168,Km 0, RA-3000 Paraje El Pozo, Sante Fe, Argentina
[4] GIMNI UTN FRSF, Lavaise 610, RA-3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
[5] Natl Lab Sci Comp LNCC MCTIC, Av Getulio Vargas 333, BR-25651075 Petropolis, Brazil
[6] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Med Assisted Sci Comp INC, Petropolis, Brazil
关键词
Embedded beam elements; Beam/solid mechanical coupling; Soil-pile interaction effects; Variational formulation; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; ELEMENT; FORMULATION; PILES;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.05.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This contribution presents the variational foundations for the embedding of Euler-Bernoulli beams into 3D solid continua. The Embedded Beam Model (EBM) explicitly incorporates the geometry of the beam/ solid interaction interface. This is achieved by introducing a displacement compatibility constraint along the entire beam/solid interaction surface, devised to model the adherence between two models, which posses different kinematical descriptions. The paper especially focuses on the theoretical aspects related to the lateral beam/solid interactions. The proposed variational model yields the Euler-Lagrange equations for the coupled problem, which are not standard because of the occurrence of interaction forces due to the kinematical constraints prescribed at the beam/solid coupling interface. Numerical strategies, based on the Finite Element Method (FEM), are proposed to handle the variational formulation at the discrete level. These numerical approaches feature no limitations regarding mesh generation for the solid domain and full coupling between beam degrees of freedom and solid kinematics is obtained in the present model. The proposed formulation is validated against the so-called Direct Numerical Simulation approach. The good performance of the proposed EBM strategy provides a solid groundwork for future improvements, yielding a methodology with strong potential for the analysis of reinforced structures. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 168
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving 1D Stellar Models with 3D Atmospheres
    Mosumgaard, Jakob Rorsted
    Aguirre, Victor Silva
    Weiss, Achim
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jorgen
    Trampedach, Regner
    SEISMOLOGY OF THE SUN AND THE DISTANT STARS 2016-USING TODAY'S SUCCESSES TO PREPARE THE FUTURE, 2017, 160
  • [2] Going from 3D to 1D: A 1D approach to common-envelope evolution
    Bronner, V. A.
    Schneider, F. R. N.
    Podsiadlowski, Ph.
    Roepke, F. K.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 683
  • [3] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    De Vincenzo, Salvatore
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2020, 135 (10):
  • [4] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    Salvatore De Vincenzo
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 135
  • [5] 3D reconstruction of 1D water tank profile series to enable volumetric evaluation of beam models
    Wolthaus, J.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    Van Asselen, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S170 - S171
  • [6] An equality checking approach for 3D solid models
    National CAD Support Software Engineering Research Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Jisuanji Fuzhu Sheji Yu Tuxingxue Xuebao, 2008, 2 (234-238):
  • [7] A singularity removal method for coupled 1D–3D flow models
    Ingeborg G. Gjerde
    Kundan Kumar
    Jan M. Nordbotten
    Computational Geosciences, 2020, 24 : 443 - 457
  • [8] Comparison of 1D and 3D Models for the Estimation of Fractional Flow Reserve
    Blanco, P. J.
    Bulant, C. A.
    Muller, L. O.
    Maso Talou, G. D.
    Guedes Bezerra, C.
    Lemos, P. L.
    Feijoo, R. A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [9] Comparison of 1D and 3D Models for the Estimation of Fractional Flow Reserve
    P. J. Blanco
    C. A. Bulant
    L. O. Müller
    G. D. Maso Talou
    C. Guedes Bezerra
    P. A. Lemos
    R. A. Feijóo
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [10] COMPARISON OF 3D IMAGING AND 1D DEPOSITION MODELS: AT WHICH DIMENSION?
    Katz, I.
    Pichelin, M.
    Majoral, C.
    Caillibotte, G.
    Montesantos, S.
    Bennett, M.
    Conway, J.
    Fleming, J.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (05) : A6 - A6