Court curbing;
state courts;
legitimacy;
judicial independence;
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE;
SUPREME COURTS;
BILL SPONSORSHIP;
DEATH-PENALTY;
REPRESENTATION;
CHALLENGES;
DEFERENCE;
DYNAMICS;
OPINION;
D O I:
10.1080/0098261X.2019.1650678
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
Legislative proposals that attack or curb state supreme courts are often introduced in state legislatures. However, the causes of state court curbing legislation have not been systematically analyzed. This article seeks to expand on existing knowledge of court curbing by examining what causes some U.S. state legislators to introduce court curbing bills. I develop a theoretical argument that court curbing is driven by court-legislator ideological distance and legislator electoral security. I demonstrate that legislators who are ideologically distant from their state supreme court and electorally secure introduce the most court curbing legislation.
机构:
Amer Bar Assoc, Ctr Human Rights & Justice Defenders Program, Chicago, IL 60654 USAAmer Bar Assoc, Ctr Human Rights & Justice Defenders Program, Chicago, IL 60654 USA
Perlin, Michael L.
Harmon, Talia Roitberg
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Niagara Univ, New York, NY USAAmer Bar Assoc, Ctr Human Rights & Justice Defenders Program, Chicago, IL 60654 USA
Harmon, Talia Roitberg
Geiger, Maren
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Niagara Univ, New York, NY USAAmer Bar Assoc, Ctr Human Rights & Justice Defenders Program, Chicago, IL 60654 USA