Organizational crisis-denial strategy: The effect of denial on public framing

被引:16
作者
van der Meer, Toni G. L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, NL-1012 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Crisis framing; Crisis-response strategy; Denial; Automated content analysis; Crisis communication; Twitter; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
By applying a framing perspective, this study explores the effect of a crisis-denial strategy on public response. The online public framing of a specific crisis is compared with the crisis-denial frame provided by the organization. An automated semantic-network analysis is used to identify frames embedded in the public and organizational communication. The Max Havelaar crisis revealed that denial strategy is not always unsuccessful and would advance a more complex understanding. Moreover, the framing perspective and the semantic-network approach prove to be useful to analyze crisis-response strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 539
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory [J].
Coombs W.T. .
Corporate Reputation Review, 2007, 10 (3) :163-176
[2]  
Coombs W.T., 2002, Management Communication Quarterly, V16, P165, DOI DOI 10.1177/089331802237233
[3]   Implicit media frames: Automated analysis of public debate on artificial sweeteners [J].
Hellsten, Iina ;
Dawson, James ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2010, 19 (05) :590-608
[4]   Are crisis communicators practicing what we preach?: An evaluation of crisis response strategy analyzed in public relations research from 1991 to 2009 [J].
Kim, Sora ;
Avery, Elizabeth Johnson ;
Lariscy, Ruthann W. .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2009, 35 (04) :446-448
[5]   Public framing organizational crisis situations: Social media versus news media [J].
van der Meer, Toni G. L. A. ;
Verhoeven, Piet .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2013, 39 (03) :229-231
[6]  
Vlieger E., 2011, The Public Journal of Semiotics, V1, P28