Understanding the Benefits of Dynamic Line Rating Under Multiple Sources of Uncertainty

被引:62
作者
Teng, Fei [1 ]
Dupin, Romain [2 ]
Michiorri, Andrea [2 ]
Kariniotakis, George [2 ]
Chen, Yanfei [1 ]
Strbac, Goran [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] PSL Res Univ, MINES Paris Tech, Ctr Proc Renewable Energies & Energy Syst PERSEE, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis, France
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic line rating; probabilistic forecasting; stochastic programming; wind generation; UNIT COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2786470
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the benefits of dynamic line rating (DLR) in the system with high penetration of wind generation. A probabilistic forecasting model for the line ratings is incorporated into a two-stage stochastic optimization model. The scheduling model, for the first time, considers the uncertainty associated with wind generation, line ratings, and line outages to co-optimize the energy production and reserve holding levels in the scheduling stage as well as the redispatch actions in the real-time operation stage. Therefore, the benefits of higher utilization of line capacity can be explicitly balanced against the costs of increased holding and utilization of reserve services due to the forecasting error. The computational burden driven by the modeling of multiple sources of uncertainty is tackled by applying an efficient filtering approach. The case studies demonstrate the benefits of the DLR in supporting cost-effective integration of high penetration of wind generation into the existing network. We also highlight the importance of simultaneously considering the multiple sources of uncertainty in understanding the benefits of DLR. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the impact of different operational strategies, the coordination among multiple flexible technologies, and the installed capacity of wind generation on the benefits of DLR.
引用
收藏
页码:3306 / 3314
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UK REN EN STRAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FINAL REPORT 20S PRO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P 2009 CIGRE IEEE PE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PROC POWER SYST COMP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 7382012 IEEE
[6]   Dynamic Line Rating Using Numerical Weather Predictions and Machine Learning: A Case Study [J].
Aznarte, Jose L. ;
Siebert, Nils .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2017, 32 (01) :335-343
[7]   Robust Corrective Control Measures in Power Systems With Dynamic Line Rating [J].
Bucher, Matthias A. ;
Andersson, Goeran .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (03) :2034-2043
[8]   A Computational Framework for Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Optimization in Unit Commitment With Wind Power Generation [J].
Constantinescu, Emil M. ;
Zavala, Victor M. ;
Rocklin, Matthew ;
Lee, Sangmin ;
Anitescu, Mihai .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (01) :431-441
[9]   NEW THERMAL RATING APPROACH - REAL-TIME THERMAL RATING SYSTEM FOR STRATEGIC OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR TRANSMISSION-LINES .1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF REAL-TIME THERMAL RATING SYSTEM [J].
DAVIS, MW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1977, 96 (03) :803-809
[10]  
Dupin R., 2016, P CIRED WORKSH, V2016, P1, DOI [10.1049/cp.2016.0722, DOI 10.1049/CP.2016.0722]