Evaluation of the "3 Good Questions" program for shared decision-making in pediatric medicine: a feasibility study

被引:8
作者
Rexwinkel, Robyn [1 ]
Rippen, Hester [2 ]
Blokzijl-Boezeman, Inge J. M. [3 ]
de Klein, Zonja [4 ]
Walhof, Christel M. [5 ]
van der Kraan, Josine [6 ]
Benninga, Marc A. [1 ]
Tabbers, Merit M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Childrens Hosp, Pediat Gastroenterol, Room C2-312,POB 22700, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Child & Hosp Fdn, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Bernhoven, Dept Pediat, Uden, Netherlands
[4] Ommelander Hosp Groningen, Dept Pediat, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Rijnstate, Dept Pediat, Arnhem, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Patient Federat, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Children; Shared decision-making; 3 Good Questions; Intervention; CANCER; PHYSICIANS; ENCOUNTER; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-020-03868-1
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The "3 Good Questions" program was developed to increase shared decision making. The current pilot-study determined the feasibility of these questions to increase shared decision-making in Dutch pediatric medicine. Pre-/postintervention surveys were used to include children (10-18 years) at pediatric outpatient clinics of four hospitals in the Netherlands. After their appointment, two different groups of children completed the questionnaires. Group 1 filled in the survey before the intervention; group 2 completed the survey after active implementation of the "3 Good Questions" program. The primary outcome was to determine the feasibility (reach, applicability). Secondary outcomes were related to patient involvement in healthcare and treatment decisions and decision-making process between child and healthcare professional. In total, 168 and 114 children in groups 1 and 2 (61 vs 63% female, P = 0.68; age 13.3 +/- 2.4 vs 13.8 +/- 2.4 years, P = 0.72), respectively, completed the questionnaire. In group 2, 44% of children were aware of the "3 Good Questions", of whom 18% posed >= 1 of the "3 Good Questions" during their appointment (feasibility). The "3 Good Questions" program led to more shared decision-making (SDM-Q-9: P = < 0.001;95%CI: - 2.43 to - 1.17). The majority of children who have read or heard of the "3 Good Questions" would recommend this program to other children. Conclusion: Implementation of the "3 Good Questions" program seemed feasible, although it is necessary to further explore the implementation of this program at national level as a simple way for children and healthcare professionals to share decisions in practice. What is known center dot Children have the right to be included in decision-making, and inclusion can improve patient satisfaction and quality of care, and reduce costs. center dot The "3 Good Questions" program was successfully implemented in adult healthcare to increase shared decision making, and therefore these "3 Good Questions" have been adapted to a child version. What is new center dot In this pilot study, we found that the implementation of the "3 Good Questions" program to increase shared decision-making in pediatric medicine seemed feasible. Although it is necessary to further explore the implementation of the "3 Good Questions" program at national level as a simple way for children and healthcare professionals to share decisions in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1242
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Shared Decision Making to Improve Care and Reduce Costs
    Lee, Emily Oshima
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [22] An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters
    Makoul, G
    Clayman, ML
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 60 (03) : 301 - 312
  • [23] Patientenfederatie Nederland, 2017, REP 3 GOOD QUEST
  • [24] Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Koelewijn-van Loon, Marije
    Sepucha, Karen
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Legare, France
    Haerter, Martin
    Dirmaier, Joerg
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (04): : 313 - 324
  • [25] Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model® intervention in a primary health-care setting
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Jones, Anna
    Bateson, Deborah
    Carey, Karen
    Trevena, Lyndal J.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Del Mar, Chris B.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Weisberg, Edith
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) : 1160 - 1168
  • [26] Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Trevena, Lyndal J.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Carey, Karen
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Del Mare, Chris B.
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Tattersall, Martin H. N.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 84 (03) : 379 - 385
  • [27] Valid informed consent and participative decision-making in children with cancer and their parents: A report of the SIOP working committee on psychosocial issues in pediatric oncology
    Spinetta, JJ
    Masera, G
    Jankovic, M
    Oppenheim, D
    Martins, AG
    Ben Arush, MW
    van Dongen-Melman, J
    Epelman, C
    Medin, G
    Pekkanen, K
    Eden, T
    [J]. MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 40 (04): : 244 - 246
  • [28] Stacey Dawn, 2017, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V4, pCD001431, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5]
  • [29] Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice
    Stiggelbout, A. M.
    Pieterse, A. H.
    De Haes, J. C. J. M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (10) : 1172 - 1179
  • [30] Doctor-parent-child relationships:: a 'pas de trois'
    Tates, K
    Elbers, E
    Meeuwesen, L
    Bensing, J
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 48 (01) : 5 - 14