The Interplay Between Working Memory and Background Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension

被引:28
作者
Shin, Jihye [1 ]
Dronjic, Vedran [1 ,2 ]
Park, Boonjoo [3 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Appl Linguist, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Language & Memory Lab, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[3] Daegu Catholic Univ, Dept English, Gyongsan, Gyeongsangbuk D, South Korea
关键词
INFERENTIAL COMPREHENSION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CAPACITY; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE; FAMILIARITY; VOCABULARY;
D O I
10.1002/tesq.482
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the known roles of working memory and background knowledge in the process of reading comprehension, few attempts have been made to elucidate the interaction between these two individual difference factors in second language (L2) reading comprehension. The current study investigated whether and how working memory and background knowledge combine to facilitate L2 reading comprehension in a context where L2 students encounter texts with and without relevant background knowledge. Seventy-nine adult Korean learners of English as a foreign language participated and completed tasks for working memory, L2 knowledge, and L2 reading comprehension. The results revealed that L2 readers with higher working memory capacity benefitted more from the provision of background knowledge, which led to achieving better reading comprehension than readers with low working memory. This finding highlights the role of working memory in L2 reading in terms of using existing resources to one's advantage particularly because no significant difference on L2 measure scores was found between the high- and low-working memory groups. Pedagogical implications are discussed regarding the importance of not only providing background knowledge when it is not already present but also following up with explicit instructional support to help all readers utilize what is available to them.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 347
页数:28
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Alderson J., 2005, DIAGNOSING FOREIGN L, DOI DOI 10.1191/0265532205LT315-D
[2]  
Alptekin C., 2006, System, V34, P494
[3]   Effects of Variations in Reading Span Task Design on the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Second Language Reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ozemir, Oya ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2014, 98 (02) :536-552
[4]   Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Content Familiarity on Literal and Inferential Comprehension in L2 Reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (02) :235-266
[5]   Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
SYSTEM, 2009, 37 (04) :627-639
[6]   The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Guelcan .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2010, 33 (02) :206-219
[7]  
Alyousef H. S., 2006, J LANGUAGE LEARNING, V5, P143
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Working Memory and Academic Learning: Assessment and Intervention
[9]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIES DISCOURSE
[10]   The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? [J].
Baddeley, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (11) :417-423