A hybrid finite difference-boundary element procedure for the simulation of turbulent MHD duct flow at finite magnetic Reynolds number

被引:20
作者
Bandaru, Vinodh [1 ]
Boeck, Thomas [1 ]
Krasnov, Dmitry [1 ]
Schumacher, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Ilmenau, Inst Thermo & Fluiddynam, D-98684 Ilmenau, Germany
关键词
Magnetohydrodynamics; Magnetic Reynolds number; Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence; Boundary integral method; Exterior problem; INTEGRAL-EQUATION APPROACH; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC TURBULENCE; DYNAMO EXPERIMENT; FIELD; DOMAINS; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A conservative coupled finite difference-boundary element computational procedure for the simulation of turbulent magnetohydrodynamic flow in a straight rectangular duct at finite magnetic Reynolds number is presented. The flow is assumed to be periodic in the streamwise direction and is driven by a mean pressure gradient. The duct walls are considered to be electrically insulated. The co-evolution of the velocity and magnetic fields as described respectively by the Navier-Stokes and the magnetic induction equations, together with the coupling of the magnetic field between the conducting domain and the non-conducting exterior, is solved using the magnetic field formulation. The aim is to simulate localized magnetic fields interacting with turbulent duct flow. Detailed verification of the implementation of the numerical scheme is conducted in the limiting case of low magnetic Reynolds number by comparing with the results obtained using a quasistatic approach that has no coupling with the exterior. The rigorous procedure with nonlocal magnetic boundary conditions is compared with simplified pseudo-vacuum boundary conditions and the differences are quantified. Our first direct numerical simulations of turbulent Hartmann duct flow at moderate magnetic Reynolds numbers and a low flow Reynolds number show significant differences in the duct flow turbulence, even at low interaction level between the flow and magnetic field. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 339
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M., 1964, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.15378
[2]  
Adams J., EFFICIENT FORTRAN SU
[3]  
Boeck T., 2010, THESIS
[5]   A MIXED FEM-BIEM METHOD TO SOLVE 3-D EDDY-CURRENT PROBLEMS [J].
BOSSAVIT, A ;
VERITE, JC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1982, 18 (02) :431-435
[6]   DYNAMO-GENERATED TURBULENCE AND LARGE-SCALE MAGNETIC-FIELDS IN A KEPLERIAN SHEAR-FLOW [J].
BRANDENBURG, A ;
NORDLUND, A ;
STEIN, RF ;
TORKELSSON, U .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 446 (02) :741-754
[7]  
Brebbia CA., 1978, BOUNDARY ELEMENT MET
[8]  
Bronshtein I.N., 2013, HDB MATH
[9]   A numerical dynamo benchmark [J].
Christensen, UR ;
Aubert, J ;
Cardin, P ;
Dormy, E ;
Gibbons, S ;
Glatzmaier, GA ;
Grote, E ;
Honkura, Y ;
Jones, C ;
Kono, M ;
Matsushima, M ;
Sakuraba, A ;
Takahashi, F ;
Tilgner, A ;
Wicht, J ;
Zhang, K .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2001, 128 (1-4) :25-34
[10]  
Christiansen S., 1971, BIT (Nordisk Tidskrift for Informationsbehandling), V11, P276, DOI 10.1007/BF01931809