Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Jones, Rob J. [2 ,3 ]
Paul, Jim [2 ]
Birrell, Fiona [4 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [1 ]
Leung, Hing Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Beatson West Scotland Canc Ctr, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Inst Canc Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
radiation recurrent prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate disease < UROLOGY; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; CRYOABLATION; CRYOSURGERY; FAILURE; TRIALS; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). Design Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. Setting and methods Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. Results SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of 29719 (Euro37619) (95% CI -51985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of 30000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. Conclusions The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] miRNAs and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Konoshenko, Maria Yu
    Bryzgunova, Olga E.
    Laktionov, Pavel P.
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2021, 1876 (02):
  • [32] Advances with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Yu, Eun-mi
    Aragon-Ching, Jeanny B.
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 23 (09) : 1015 - 1033
  • [33] Combining radiation therapy and androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer-a critical review
    Dal Pra, A.
    Cury, F. L.
    Souhami, L.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 219 - 229
  • [34] Androgen Deprivation With or Without Radiation Therapy for Clinically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    Gray, Phillip J.
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (07):
  • [35] Multimodal Primary Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Androgen Deprivation and Radiation
    Joensuu, Timo
    Joensuu, Greetta
    Kairemo, Kalevi
    Kiljunen, Timo
    Riener, Maigo
    Aaltonen, Aili
    Ala-Opas, Martti
    Kangasmaki, Aki
    Alanko, Tuomo
    Taipale, Lauri
    Hervonen, Petteri
    Butzow, Anna
    Virgolini, Irene
    Hemminki, Akseli
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (12) : 6439 - 6447
  • [36] Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer
    Dost, Rutger J.
    Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
    Breeuwsma, Anthonius J.
    de Jong, Igle J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S41 - S47
  • [37] Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on choline PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer
    Rutger J. Dost
    Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
    Anthonius J. Breeuwsma
    Igle J. de Jong
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013, 40 : 41 - 47
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy from a Chinese perspective
    Zheng, H. R.
    Wen, F.
    Wu, Y. F.
    Wheeler, J. R. C.
    Li, Q.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2017, 26 (06)
  • [39] Prostate cancer treatment and the relationship of androgen deprivation therapy to cognitive function
    Reiss, A. B.
    Saeedullah, U.
    Grossfeld, D. J.
    Glass, A. D.
    Pinkhasov, A.
    Katz, A. E.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 (05) : 733 - 741
  • [40] Prostate cancer treatment and the relationship of androgen deprivation therapy to cognitive function
    A. B. Reiss
    U. Saeedullah
    D. J. Grossfeld
    A. D. Glass
    A. Pinkhasov
    A. E. Katz
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2022, 24 : 733 - 741