Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Jones, Rob J. [2 ,3 ]
Paul, Jim [2 ]
Birrell, Fiona [4 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [1 ]
Leung, Hing Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Beatson West Scotland Canc Ctr, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Inst Canc Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
radiation recurrent prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate disease < UROLOGY; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; CRYOABLATION; CRYOSURGERY; FAILURE; TRIALS; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). Design Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. Setting and methods Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. Results SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of 29719 (Euro37619) (95% CI -51985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of 30000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. Conclusions The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and risk of dementia
    Robinson, David
    Garmo, Hans
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Damber, Jan-Erik
    Bratt, Ola
    Holmberg, Lars
    Wahlund, Lars-Olof
    Stattin, Par
    Adolfsson, Jan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [22] Cardiovascular risks of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
    Miller, K.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (05): : 627 - 631
  • [23] Androgen deprivation therapy as backbone therapy in the management of prostate cancer
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Alcaraz, Antonio
    von Klot, Christoph A.
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 7263 - 7274
  • [24] Androgen and prostate cancer: the role of primary androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer
    Namiki, Mikio
    Kitagawa, Yasuhide
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    Koh, Eitetsu
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2008, 5 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [25] A Cost-Effectiveness and Quality of Life Analysis of Different Approaches to the Management and Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Harat, Aleksandra
    Harat, Maciej
    Martinson, Melissa
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [26] The Use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Combination With Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Anderson, Eric M.
    Mcbride, Sean M.
    FRONTIERS IN UROLOGY, 2022, 2
  • [27] Mortality and Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Salvage Treatment for Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Fu, Alex Z.
    Tsai, Huei-Ting
    Haque, Reina
    Yood, Marianne Ulcickas
    Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
    Van Den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    Smith, Matthew R.
    Zhou, Yingjun
    Aaronson, David S.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with normal and hypofractionated schemes for the treatment of localised prostate cancer
    Zemplenyi, A. T.
    Kalo, Z.
    Kovacs, G.
    Farkas, R.
    Beothe, T.
    Banyai, D.
    Sebestyen, Z.
    Endrei, D.
    Boncz, I.
    Mangel, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (01)
  • [29] Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Implications for cardiometabolic clinical care
    Collins, L.
    Mohammed, N.
    Ahmad, T.
    Basaria, S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION, 2012, 35 (03) : 332 - 339
  • [30] Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (03) : 159 - 167