Decision analytic cost-effectiveness model to compare prostate cryotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of radiation recurrent prostate cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Boyd, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Jones, Rob J. [2 ,3 ]
Paul, Jim [2 ]
Birrell, Fiona [4 ]
Briggs, Andrew H. [1 ]
Leung, Hing Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Beatson West Scotland Canc Ctr, Canc Res UK Clin Trials Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Coll Med Vet & Life Sci, Inst Canc Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Dept Urol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Beatson Inst Canc Res, Glasgow G61 1BD, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
radiation recurrent prostate cancer; cost-effectiveness analysis; androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate disease < UROLOGY; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; CRYOABLATION; CRYOSURGERY; FAILURE; TRIALS; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007925
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the cost-effectiveness of salvage cryotherapy (SC) in men with radiation recurrent prostate cancer (RRPC). Design Cost-utility analysis using decision analytic modelling by a Markov model. Setting and methods Compared SC and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a cohort of patients with RRPC (biopsy proven local recurrence, no evidence of metastatic disease). A literature review captured published data to inform the decision model, and resource use data were from the Scottish Prostate Cryotherapy Service. The model was run in monthly cycles for RRPC men, mean age of 70years. The model was run over the patient lifetime, to assess changes in patient health states and the associated quality of life, survival and cost impacts. Results are reported in terms of the discounted incremental costs and discounted incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained between the 2 alternative interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis used a 10000 iteration Monte Carlo simulation. Results SC has a high upfront treatment cost, but delays the ongoing monthly cost of ADT. SC is the dominant strategy over the patient lifetime; it is more effective with an incremental 0.56 QALY gain (95% CI 0.28 to 0.87), and less costly with a reduced lifetime cost of 29719 (Euro37619) (95% CI -51985 to -9243). For a ceiling ratio of 30000, SC has a 100% probability to be cost-effective. The cost neutral point was at 3.5years, when the upfront cost of SC (plus any subsequent cumulative cost of side effects and ADT) equates the cumulative cost in the ADT arm. Limitations of our model may arise from its insensitivity to parameter or structural uncertainty. Conclusions The platform for SC versus ADT cost-effective analysis can be employed to evaluate other treatment modalities or strategies in RRPC. SC is the dominant strategy, costing less over a patient's lifetime with improvements in QALYs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salvage focal cryosurgery may delay use of androgen deprivation therapy in cryotherapy and radiation recurrent prostate cancer patients
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Berg, Courtney J.
    Kosinski, Kaitlin E.
    Habibian, David J.
    Schiff, Jeffrey T.
    Corcoran, Anthony T.
    Katz, Aaron E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2017, 33 (07) : 810 - 813
  • [2] Reducing Bias in the Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Montie, James E.
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (05) : 374 - 380
  • [3] Use of androgen deprivation therapy as salvage treatment after primary therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Fu, Alex Z.
    Tsai, Huei-Ting
    Haque, Reina
    Yood, Marianne Ulcickas
    Van Den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
    Zhou, Yingjun
    Keating, Nancy L.
    Smith, Matthew R.
    Aaronson, David S.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (12) : 1611 - 1619
  • [4] Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Levy, Joseph F.
    Khairnar, Rahul
    Louie, Alexander, V
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Mishra, Mark, V
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 (02) : E172 - E179
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Health Index for prostate cancer detection
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Wu, Joanne
    Huang, Joice
    Denham, Dwight
    Frencher, Stanley K.
    Jacobsen, Steven J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (03) : 353 - 362
  • [6] The Role of Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy in the Management of Biochemically Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Jaswal, Jasbir
    Crook, Juanita
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (03)
  • [7] Salvage cryotherapy with third-generation technology for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy
    Lian, Huibo
    Yang, Rong
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Gutian
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 48 (09) : 1461 - 1466
  • [8] Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation in the Management of High Risk Prostate Cancer
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Cury, Fabio L.
    Souhami, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2011, 37 (02): : 161 - 175
  • [9] Complications of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer
    Schwandt, Anita
    Garcia, Jorge A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 322 - 326
  • [10] Use of androgen deprivation and salvage radiation therapy for patients with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Albrecht, Clemens
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Flentje, Michael
    Ganswindt, Ute
    Hoecht, Stefan
    Hoelscher, Tobias
    Sedlmayer, Felix
    Wenz, Frederik
    Zips, Daniel
    Wiegel, Thomas
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (07) : 619 - 626