Shielding effectiveness of X-ray protective garment

被引:9
作者
Eder, H. [1 ]
Schlattl, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Bavarian Environm Agcy, D-81243 Munich, Germany
[2] Deutsch Forschungszentrum Gesundheit & Umwelt Gmb, Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Ingolstadter Landstr 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2021年 / 82卷
关键词
Protective garment; Attenuation factor; Effective dose; Organ doses;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.01.081
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Certification of the X-ray shielding garment is based on attenuation testing on flat material samples. We investigated the difference of shielding effectiveness compared to realistic use when the garment is worn on the body of a staff person. Methods: Attenuation factors of X-ray protective aprons have been evaluated for several clinical scenarios with Monte Carlo (MC) calculations based on the ICRP female reference model and an experimental setup. The MC calculated attenuation factors refer to the effective dose E, whereas the measured attenuation factors refer to the personal dose equivalent Hp(10). The calculated/measured factors were compared to the attenuation factors of the identical materials measured under the conditions of the standard IEC 61331-1 that is currently in use for the type testing of X-ray protective aprons. Results: As a result, for example, at a common tube voltage of 80 kV, the real attenuation factors of a 0.35 mm Pb apron worn by a 3-dimensional body were 38% to 76% higher than when measured under IEC conditions on flat samples. The MC-calculated organ doses show the maximum contribution to E being within the operator?s abdomen/pelvis region. Conclusions: With our findings, personal X-ray protective garments could be improved in effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 350
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VEROFFENTLICHUNGEN S, V43
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 68152013 DIN
[3]  
ASTM, 2014, F309414 ASTM INT
[4]   Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons? [J].
Bartal, Gabriel ;
Sailer, Anna M. ;
Vano, Eliseo .
TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 21 (01) :2-6
[5]  
Brodecki M, 2019, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V178, P101
[6]   COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL METHODS OF PATIENT DOSE ESTIMATIONS IN CT USING ANTHROPOMORPHIC MODELS [J].
Fehrmann, M. L. ;
Schegerer, A. ;
Werncke, T. ;
Schlattl, H. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 190 (01) :71-83
[7]  
Huyskens C J, 2002, C 6 WORKSH OCC EXP O
[8]  
ICRP, 2010, ICRP Publication, V116
[9]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection(ICRP), 2009, ICRP Publication, V110
[10]  
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2014, 61331 IEC 3