Turbidity, velocity and interspecific interactions affect foraging behaviour of rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides) and yellowfin shiners (Notropis lutippinis)

被引:25
作者
Hazelton, P. D. [1 ]
Grossman, G. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
turbidity; sediment; dominance; competition; density; JUVENILE COHO SALMON; INCREASED SUSPENDED SEDIMENT; STREAM FISHES; INTRASPECIFIC AGGRESSION; ONCORHYNCHUS-KISUTCH; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; MICROHABITAT USE; PREY DETECTION; RAINBOW-TROUT; WATER-QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00359.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Fish diversity is strongly affected by habitat degradation (e.g., increased turbidity) and invasive species. We examined the effects of turbidity, velocity, length, dominance and intra- and interspecific competition on focal point depth, movement rate, dominance and aggression rate in native rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides) and invasive yellowfin shiners (Notropis lutipinnis) in a southern Appalachian stream (NC, USA). We compared results for intra- and interspecific groups of fishes at two densities (two and four fishes), three turbidity levels (10, 20 and 30 nephelometric turbidity units), and two velocities (12, 18 cm center dot s(-1)). Dominance was significantly correlated with length in intraspecific groups of both species, and dominant fish held more profitable foraging positions about 75% of the time. Yellowfin shiners were dominant more often than rosyside dace in interspecific trials. Akaike's Information Criterion indicated that models containing turbidity, velocity, species and intraspecific competition, explained the greatest amount of information in focal point depth data. By contrast, movement and aggression rates were best explained by models based on dominance and velocity. Finally, aggression rate was best explained by models containing fish length and turbidity. These results indicate that habitat degradation, intra- and interspecific interactions influence the foraging behaviour and future success of these species in the Little Tennessee River drainage.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 436
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
BARRETT JC, 1992, T AM FISH SOC, V121, P437, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1992)121<0437:TICIRD>2.3.CO
[2]  
2
[4]   EFFECT OF SILTATION ON STREAM FISH COMMUNITIES [J].
BERKMAN, HE ;
RABENI, CF .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 1987, 18 (04) :285-294
[5]   Cumulative impacts of landuse on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed [J].
Bolstad, PV ;
Swank, WT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1997, 33 (03) :519-533
[6]  
Burkhead NM, 2001, T AM FISH SOC, V130, P959, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0959:EOSSOT>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Burnham KP., 1998, MODEL SELECTION MULT
[10]  
Dowdy S., 2004, STAT RES