3D breath-held cardiac function with projection reconstruction in steady state free precession validated using 2D cine MRI

被引:41
作者
Peters, DC
Ennis, DB
Rohatgi, P
Syed, MA
McVeigh, ER
Arai, AE
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Cardiac MR Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] NHLBI, Cardiac Energet Lab, Natl Inst Hlth, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
radial imaging : projection reconstruction; cardiac function; validation : 3D SSFP; left ventricle; global function; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20145
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and validate a three-dimensional (3D) single breath-hold. projection reconstruction (PR), balanced steady state free precession (SSFP) method for cardiac function evaluation against a two-dimensional (2D) multislice Fourier (Cartesian) transform (FT) SSFP method. Materials and Methods: The 3D PR SSFP sequence used projections in the x-y plane and partitions in z, providing 70 - 80 msec temporal resolution and 1.7 x 1.7 x 8 - 10 mm in a 24-heartbeat breath hold. A total of 10 volunteers were imaged with both methods, and the measurements of global cardiac function were compared. Results: Mean signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for the blood and myocardium were 114 and 42 (213) and 59 and 21 (3D). Bland-Altman analysis comparing the 2D and 3D ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end systolic volume (LVESV). and end diastolic myocardial mass (LVEDM) provided values of bias +/-2 SD of 0.6% +/- 7.7% for LVEF, 5.9 mL +/- 20 mL for LVEDV, -2.8 mL +/- 12 mL for LVESV. and -0.61 g +/- 13 g for LVEDM. 3D interobserver variability was greater than 2D for LVEDM and LVESV. Conclusion: In a single breath hold, the 3D PR method provides comparable information to the standard 2D FT method, which employs 10-12 breath holds.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 416
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Alley MT, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P751, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199905)9:5<751::AID-JMRI21>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-7
[3]  
Barger AV, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P821, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<821::AID-MRM1>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-S
[5]   Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR Imaging [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Goyen, M ;
Rühm, SG ;
Eggebrecht, H ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ladd, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (03) :731-735
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction - Assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Chuang, ML ;
Hibberd, MG ;
Salton, CJ ;
Beaudin, RA ;
Riley, MF ;
Parker, RA ;
Douglas, PS ;
Manning, WJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) :477-484
[8]   REDUCTION OF PARTIAL-VOLUME ARTIFACTS WITH ZERO-FILLED INTERPOLATION IN 3-DIMENSIONAL MR-ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DU, YPP ;
PARKER, DL ;
DAVIS, WL ;
CAO, G .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 4 (05) :733-741
[9]  
FOO TK, 2001, P 8 ANN M ISMRM GLAS
[10]   SELECTION OF A CONVOLUTION FUNCTION FOR FOURIER INVERSION USING GRIDDING [J].
JACKSON, JI ;
MEYER, CH ;
NISHIMURA, DG ;
MACOVSKI, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1991, 10 (03) :473-478