Supernumerary marker chromosome 15 in a male with azoospermia and open bite deformity

被引:13
作者
Koc, Altug [1 ]
Onur, S. Odul
Ergun, Mehmet Ali [1 ]
Percin, E. Ferda [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Genet, TR-06500 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
auriculocondylar syndrome; azoospermia; infertility; isodicentric; 15q; open bite deformity; small supernumerary marker chromosome 15; INV DUP(15); PATIENT;
D O I
10.1038/aja.2009.37
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Supernumerary marker chromosome 15 (sSMC[ 15]) is the most frequent marker chromosome, and it is generally regarded as unimportant if it does not contain the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region (PWACR). The clinical importance of the larger markers in association with the critical region is mentioned in almost all reports related to marker chromosome 15, and smaller markers are solely associated with minor dysmorphic features, azoospermia and recurrent miscarriages. However, these small sSMC(15)s without the PWACR may also determine a specific phenotype. A dysmorphic examination of an azoospermic patient in a genetics clinic was performed and was followed by a peripheral blood lymphocyte chromosomal analysis according to standard cytogenetic methods. Nucleolar region (NOR) banding, C-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and a molecular investigation of Y-microdeletions were also performed. The clinical evaluation identified dysmorphic features accompanied with azoospermia and severe 'Angle Class II, Division 1 Open Bite Deformity'. The molecular cytogenetic study revealed the small sSMC(15). In addition, a Y-microdeletion analysis showed that the azoospermia was not the result of a deletion. Although the presented case might represent a coincidental example of supernumerary marker 15 and mandibular anomaly association, the condition may also define a specific phenotype that may be more than azoospermia. This condition may be characterized by infertility, malar hypoplasia, mandibular anomaly, keloid formation and minor dysmorphic features.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 622
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] The inv dup(15) or idic(15) syndrome: A clinically recognisable neurogenetic disorder
    Battaglia, A
    [J]. BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 27 (05) : 365 - 369
  • [2] Supernumerary marker 15 chromosome in a patient with Prader-Willi syndrome
    Borelina, D
    Esperante, S
    Gutnisky, V
    Ferreiro, V
    Ferrer, M
    Giliberto, F
    Frechtel, G
    Francipane, L
    Szijan, I
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2004, 65 (03) : 242 - 243
  • [3] CHENG SD, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V55, P753
  • [4] FISH characterization of dynamic mosaicism involving an inv dup(15) in a patient with mental retardation
    Cockwell, AE
    Dávalos, IP
    Rivera, HR
    Crolla, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2001, 103 (04): : 289 - 294
  • [5] Cotter PD, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P721, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199908)19:8<721::AID-PD616>3.3.CO
  • [6] 2-D
  • [7] Clinical findings in 33 subjects with large supernumerary marker(15) chromosomes and 3 subjects with triplication of 15q11-q13
    Dennis, NR
    Veltman, MWM
    Thompson, R
    Craig, E
    Bolton, PF
    Thomas, NS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2006, 140A (05) : 434 - 441
  • [8] CHARACTERIZATION OF A SMALL SUPERNUMERARY RING X-CHROMOSOME BY FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION
    DUNCAN, AMV
    MACDONALD, A
    BROWN, CJ
    WOLFF, D
    WILLARD, HF
    SUTTON, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1993, 47 (08): : 1153 - 1156
  • [9] Supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 15:: analysis of 32 new cases
    Eggermann, K
    Mau, UA
    Bujdosó, G
    Koltai, E
    Engels, H
    Schubert, R
    Eggermann, T
    Raff, R
    Schwanitz, G
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2002, 62 (01) : 89 - 93
  • [10] Characterization of an analphoid supernumerary marker chromosome derived from 15q25→qter using high-resolution CGH and multiplex FISH analyses
    Huang, XL
    de Michelena, MI
    Mark, HFL
    Harston, R
    Benke, PJ
    Price, SJ
    Milunsky, A
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2005, 68 (06) : 513 - 519