Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures

被引:489
作者
Sheetz, Kyle H. [1 ,2 ]
Claflin, Jake [3 ]
Dimick, Justin B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Rd,NCRC Bldg 16,Room 100N-11, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
DIFFUSION; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This cohort study characterizes trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Key PointsQuestionGiven concerns that robotic surgery is increasing for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit, how is the use of robotic surgery changing over time? FindingsIn this cohort study of 169404 patients in 73 hospitals, the use of robotic surgery for all general surgery procedures increased from 1.8% to 15.1% from 2012 to 2018. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. MeaningThese findings highlight a need to continually monitor the adoption of robotic surgery to ensure that enthusiasm for new technology does not outpace the evidence needed to use it in the most effective clinical contexts. ImportanceIncreasing use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures with limited evidence and unclear clinical benefit is raising concern. Analyses of population-based trends in practice and how hospitals' acquisition of robotic surgical technologies is associated with their use are limited. ObjectiveTo characterize trends in the use of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used clinical registry data from Michigan from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2018. Trends were characterized in the use of robotic surgery for common procedures for which traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery was already considered a safe and effective approach for most surgeons when clinically feasible. A multigroup interrupted time series analysis was performed to determine how procedural approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) change after hospitals launch a robotic surgery program. Data were analyzed from March 1 through April 19, 2019. ExposuresInitiation of robotic surgery. Main Outcomes and MeasuresProcedure approach (ie, robotic, open, or laparoscopic). ResultsThe study cohort included 169404 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [16.9] years; 90595 women [53.5%]) at 73 hospitals. The use of robotic surgery increased from 1.8% in 2012 to 15.1% in 2018 (8.4-fold increase; slope, 2.1% per year; 95% CI, 1.9%-2.3%). For certain procedures, the magnitude of the increase was greater; for example, for inguinal hernia repair, the use of robotic surgery increased from 0.7% to 28.8% (41.1-fold change; slope, 5.4% per year; 95% CI, 5.1%-5.7%). The use of robotic surgery increased 8.8% in the first 4 years after hospitals began performing robotic surgery (2.8% per year; 95% CI, 2.7%-2.9%). This trend was associated with a decrease in laparoscopic surgery from 53.2% to 51.3% (difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -2.2% to -1.6%). Before adopting robotic surgery, hospitals' use of laparoscopic surgery increased 1.3% per year. After adopting robotic surgery, the use of laparoscopic surgery declined 0.3% (difference in trends, -1.6%; 95% CI, -1.7% to -1.5%). Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that robotic surgery has continued to diffuse across a broad range of common surgical procedures. Hospitals that launched robotic surgery programs had a broad and immediate increase in the use of robotic surgery, which was associated with a decrease in traditional laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Estimation of the Acquisition and Operating Costs for Robotic Surgery
    Childers, Christopher P.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (08): : 835 - 836
  • [2] Coverage With Evidence Development for Medicare Beneficiaries Challenges and Next Steps
    Daniel, Gregory W.
    Rubens, Erin K.
    McClellan, Mark
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (14) : 1281 - 1282
  • [3] Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial
    Jayne, David
    Pigazzi, Alessio
    Marshall, Helen
    Croft, Julie
    Corrigan, Neil
    Copeland, Joanne
    Quirke, Phil
    West, Nick
    Rautio, Tero
    Thomassen, Niels
    Tilney, Henry
    Gudgeon, Mark
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Edlin, Richard
    Hulme, Claire
    Brown, Julia
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (16): : 1569 - 1580
  • [4] Association of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs, 2003 to 2015
    Jeong, In Gab
    Khandwala, Yash S.
    Kim, Jae Heon
    Han, Deok Hyun
    Li, Shufeng
    Wang, Ye
    Chang, Steven L.
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (16): : 1561 - 1568
  • [5] Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013
    Juo, Yen-Yi
    Mantha, Aditya
    Abiri, Ahmad
    Lin, Anne
    Dutson, Erik
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03): : 1405 - 1413
  • [6] Is Minimally Invasive Colon Resection Better Than Traditional Approaches? First Comprehensive National Examination With Propensity Score Matching
    Juo, Yen-Yi
    Hyder, Omar
    Haider, Adil H.
    Camp, Melissa
    Lidor, Anne
    Ahuja, Nita
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [7] The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample
    Khorgami, Zhamak
    Li, Wei T.
    Jackson, Theresa N.
    Howard, C. Anthony
    Sclabas, Guido M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2217 - 2221
  • [8] The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery
    Kim, H. J.
    Choi, G. -S.
    Park, J. S.
    Park, S. Y.
    Yang, C. S.
    Lee, H. J.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 (05) : O103 - O113
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lee, Sung Ryol
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Shin, Jun Ho
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 62 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [10] The Association Between Diffusion of the Surgical Robot and Radical Prostatectomy Rates
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Yu, James B.
    Desai, Rani A.
    Penson, David F.
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (04) : 333 - 339