Sustainability Assessment: Does the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework for BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) Put an End to Disputes Over The Recognition and Measurement of Intellectual Capital?

被引:16
作者
Popescu, Cristina Raluca Gh [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Craiova, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Craiova 200396, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Fac Theoret & Appl Econ, Econ Doctoral Sch 1, Dept Econ & Econ Policy, Bucharest 010374, Romania
[3] Univ Bucharest, Fac Business & Adm, Dept Econ & Adm Sci, Bucharest 030018, Romania
[4] Natl Inst Res & Dev Environm Protect INCDPM, Dept Nat & Technol Hazards, Bucharest 060031, Romania
[5] Natl Inst Res & Dev Comoti Turbomotors, Bucharest 061126, Romania
关键词
empirical research; capital structure; intellectual assets; intellectual capital; intellectual property; evaluation; measuring; erosion of the tax base; aggressive tax planning; accounting; economic and financial analysis; performance indicators; integrated assessment; sustainability assessment; sustainability; sustainable development; corporate social responsibility; quality; value; INNOVATION; IMPACT; STATE;
D O I
10.3390/su122310004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nowadays, sustainability assessment procedures, sustainability assessment indicators, and sustainability assessment models are regarded by specialists as powerful decision-supporting tools able to foster sustainable development worldwide by addressing the main economic, financial, social, and environmental challenges. In like manner, the role and relevance of intangible assets have managed to produce an irreversible change in today's world which also seriously affected the general traits of our economic systems, leading to a phenomenon known by specialists as the "revolution of intangibles". Over the last decades, the controversies regarding the recognition and measurement of intellectual capital (IC) have led, on the one hand, to the development of possible solutions and systems for calculating and disclosing the performance generated or stimulated by various components of IC, but, on the other hand, they have also been the main premise that favored the use of intangible assets, in general, and intellectual property (IP), in particular, the transfer of results and the reduction of the tax base by transferring income to tax havens or jurisdictions that do not tax these categories of assets. Against these aggressive methods of fiscal planning, the countries reacted unitarily and coordinated through the BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project) plan. Based on the country's profile as well as on the results of the annual evaluations published by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), our study verifies whether there are premises for IP use for income transfer into favorable jurisdictions and whether the measures and solutions proposed by Action 5 of the BEPS end disputes over the recognition and evaluation of IC. In addition, our work presents a novel methodological framework for sustainability assessment, which focuses on establishing important connections between the recognition and measurement of intellectual capital, the role of sustainability assessment tools, and the implications of corporate social responsibility, since, these days, the real "values" associated with a country or business profile may be found in the intangible assets they possess.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Aceleanu M.I., 2012, Management Marketing, V7, P717
  • [2] Sustainability and Competitiveness of Romanian Farms through Organic Agriculture
    Aceleanu, Mirela Ionela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (03):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 38 IAS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, The updated OECD youth action plan: Building blocks for future action
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators for Adopting Sustainable Soil Management Practices in Mediterranean Olive Groves
    Aznar-Sanchez, Jose A.
    Velasco-Munoz, Juan F.
    Lopez-Felices, Belen
    del Moral-Torres, Fernando
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [6] FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    BARNEY, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) : 99 - 120
  • [7] Bontis N., 1998, Management Decision, V36, P63, DOI [10.1108/00251749810204142, DOI 10.1108/00251749810204142, DOI 10.13189/UJAF.2021.090610]
  • [8] Multitemporal Analysis of Soil Sealing and Land Use Changes Linked to Urban Expansion of Salamanca (Spain) Using Landsat Images and Soil Carbon Management as a Mitigating Tool for Climate Change
    Criado, Marco
    Santos-Frances, Fernando
    Martinez-Grana, Antonio
    Sanchez, Yolanda
    Merchan, Leticia
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [9] Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
    Grant, RM
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 : 109 - 122
  • [10] Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research
    Guthrie, James
    Ricceri, Federica
    Dumay, John
    [J]. BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 44 (02) : 68 - 82