Factors influencing the in vitro deposition of tobramycin aerosol:: A comparison of an ultrasonic nebulizer and a high-frequency vibrating mesh nebulizer

被引:21
作者
Pedersen, Kenneth Manby
Handlos, Vagn Neerup
Heslet, Lars
Kristensen, Henning Gjelstrup
机构
[1] Danish Univ Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Hosp Corp, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Abdominal Intens Care Unit, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG | 2006年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
aeroneb; aerosol quality; airflow; deposition; formulation; in vitro; inhalation; nebulizer; SUN; tobramycin; ventilator;
D O I
10.1089/jam.2006.19.175
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to elaborate recommendations for inhalation during mechanical ventilation that could optimize delivery. Delivery of aerosols in vitro from nebulizers during mechanical ventilation is dependent on the dimensions of the ventilator circuit, the nebulizer type, and the ventilator settings. A review of the literature shows that some ventilator settings have a larger influence on the amount of aerosol delivered than others. It has been shown in an in vitro model that the factors influencing delivered aerosol are the ventilator flow rate, the diameter of the endotracheal tube, and the time spent in inspiration (all p < 0.05). Two different nebulizer types were used in the study: an ultrasonic nebulizer (SUN 345) and a high-frequency vibrating mesh nebulizer (Aeroneb Pro). No difference in the amount delivered was seen with different nebulizer types (p = 0.215). For optimizing the amount delivered, the largest possible flow, endotracheal tube, and time spent in inspiration should be used.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Eradication of endotracheal tube biofilm by nebulised gentamicin [J].
Adair, CG ;
Gorman, SP ;
Byers, LM ;
Jones, DS ;
Feron, B ;
Crowe, M ;
Webb, HC ;
McCarthy, GJ ;
Milligan, KR .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (04) :426-431
[2]   THE DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AEROSOLS THROUGH ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBES [J].
AHRENS, RC ;
RIES, RA ;
POPENDORF, W ;
WIESE, JA .
PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1986, 2 (01) :19-26
[3]  
BISHOP MJ, 1994, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P695
[4]   Epidemiology of ventilator associated pneumonia [J].
Craven, DE .
CHEST, 2000, 117 (04) :186S-187S
[5]  
Dhand R, 2000, Respir Care, V45, P636
[6]   ALBUTEROL DELIVERY IN A MODEL OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION - COMPARISON OF METERED-DOSE INHALER AND NEBULIZER EFFICIENCY [J].
DIOT, P ;
MORRA, L ;
SMALDONE, GC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 152 (04) :1391-1394
[7]  
DUBERSTEIN R, 1978, J PARENTER DRUG ASS, V32, P4
[8]  
FIDLER HM, 1991, THORAX, V46, pP285
[9]  
FINK JB, 2001, AM THOR SOC 97 INT C
[10]   EFFICIENCY OF BRONCHODILATOR AEROSOL DELIVERY TO THE LUNGS FROM THE METERED-DOSE INHALER IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS - A STUDY COMPARING 4 DIFFERENT ACTUATOR DEVICES [J].
FULLER, HD ;
DOLOVICH, MB ;
TURPIE, FH ;
NEWHOUSE, MT .
CHEST, 1994, 105 (01) :214-218