Measures of success: Prediction of successful labor induction

被引:17
|
作者
Gibson, Kelly S. [1 ]
Waters, Thaddeus P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44109 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
Induction of labor; Cervical ripening; Bishop score; Parity; Estimated fetal weight; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CESAREAN DELIVERY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; RISK; PROGRESSION; MACROSOMIA; PREGNANCY; PATTERNS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Ideally, all pregnant women would enter labor spontaneously at the safest time to yield the best health outcomes for both themselves and their newboms. Unfortunately, this does not always happen and leaves obstetric providers weighing the maternal and fetal risks of continued expectant management versus labor induction. Several elements have been reported to affect the success rate of an induction, including the Bishop score, matemal parity, body mass index (BMI), age, medical comorbidities, fetal gestational age, and estimated weight, as well as the hospital site and provider practice. Recent data suggest that the decision to induce or continue expectant management in anticipation of labor is an important variable in determining whether a woman has a safe and successful delivery. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 482
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction models for determining the success of labor induction: A systematic review
    Meier, Kennedy
    Parrish, Jacqueline
    D'Souza, Rohan
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (09) : 1100 - 1112
  • [2] Factors associated with successful induction of labor
    Al-Shaikh, Ghadeer K.
    Wahabi, Hayfaa A.
    Fayed, Amel A.
    Esmaeil, Samia A.
    Al-Malki, Ghada A.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [3] Induction of Labor and Cesarean: What is the True Relationship?
    Little, Sarah E.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 58 (02) : 269 - 281
  • [4] The vague of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor
    Rane, SM
    Guirgis, RR
    Higgins, B
    Nicolaides, KH
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 24 (05) : 538 - 549
  • [5] Prediction of successful labor induction using transvaginal sonographic cervical measurements
    Pennachiotti Pitarello, Patricia da Rocha
    Yoshizaki, Carlos Tadashi
    Ruano, Rodrigo
    Zugaib, Marcelo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2013, 41 (02) : 76 - 83
  • [6] Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor
    Ivars, Joanna
    Garabedian, Charles
    Devos, Patrick
    Therby, Denis
    Carlier, Sabine
    Deruelle, Philippe
    Subtil, Damien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 203 : 309 - 314
  • [7] Failed induction of labor
    Schoen, Corina
    Navathe, Reshama
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 483 - 487
  • [8] Predictors of Induction Success
    Grobman, William A.
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 36 (05) : 344 - 347
  • [9] Prediction of successful labor induction with very unfavorable cervix: A comparison of six scores
    Tollon, Pauline
    Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline
    Drumez, Elodie
    Ghesquiere, Louise
    Le Ray, Camille
    Garabedian, Charles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [10] Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?
    Navve, D.
    Orenstein, N.
    Ribak, R.
    Daykan, Y.
    Shechter-Maor, G.
    Biron-Shental, T.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (05) : 480 - 483