The Effects of Representation Tool (Visible-Annotation) Types to Support Knowledge Building in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

被引:2
作者
Shin, Yoonhee [1 ]
Kim, Dongsik [1 ]
Jung, Jaewon [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Educ Technol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY | 2018年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Visible-annotation; Computer-supported collaborative learning; Shared knowledge; Constructed knowledge; MENTAL MODELS; GUIDANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effectiveness of visible-annotation types used in online discussions to enhance the accuracy of shared knowledge and the level of constructed knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Three types of visible-annotation were developed specifically for this study, which had the function of linking learners' annotations to related learning content. The participants were randomly assigned into one of three groups. Each group was provided with different types of visible annotations for building shared knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning: the TL-type for two content-understanding learning phases; the TLL-type for one concept-understanding learning phase and one content-understanding learning phase; and the C-type for one content-understanding learning phase. After completing the knowledge-sharing stage, the accuracy of the participants' shared knowledge was measured. During the knowledge-construction stage, the participants carried out a lesson-planning task in pairs and constructed knowledge was analyzed based on the lesson plan. The findings revealed that the TLL-type of visible annotation with one concept-understanding learning phase and one content-understanding learning phase was the most effective for enhancing the accuracy of shared knowledge and the level of constructed knowledge in the computer-supported collaborative learning environment.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 110
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359
[2]  
Bromme R., 2000, PRACTICING INTERDISC, P115
[3]   Reflections on shared cognition [J].
Cannon-Bowers, JA ;
Salas, E .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 :195-202
[4]  
Castek J., 2014, DIGITAL TOOLS WRITIN
[5]  
Chuy M., 2011, The Proceedings of the 2011 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, P57
[6]  
Clark H., 1991, AM PSYCHOL ASS, P127, DOI DOI 10.1037/10096-006
[7]   Measuring Shared Team Mental Models: A Meta-Analysis [J].
DeChurch, Leslie A. ;
Mesmer-Magnus, Jessica R. .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 14 (01) :1-14
[8]  
Dick W., 2004, The systematic design of instruction, V6
[9]   Visualizing the sequential process of knowledge elaboration in computer-supported collaborative problem solving [J].
Ding, N. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2009, 52 (02) :509-519
[10]   Enhancing student knowledge acquisition from online learning conversations [J].
Eryilmaz, Evren ;
van der Pol, Jakko ;
Ryan, Terry ;
Clark, Philip Martin ;
Mary, Justin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2013, 8 (01) :113-144